1987
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90653-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of rat lateral hypothalamic neuron activity to vestibular nuclei stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, however, some evidence, that the saccule has retained some acoustic function in higher vertebrates and that it is still sensitive to sound, mediating evoked myogenic responses to acoustic stimuli [ 75 ]. This saccular sensitivity, moreover, also has other consequences, as projections from the vestibular system to the autonomic nervous system have been documented at several levels of the nervous system [ 76 , 77 ]. Some of these consequences are affectively-laden, with several effects from nausea and changes in cardiovascular activity to hedonic responses associated with vestibular self-stimulation.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Coping With Sounds: Reactive Behaviomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, some evidence, that the saccule has retained some acoustic function in higher vertebrates and that it is still sensitive to sound, mediating evoked myogenic responses to acoustic stimuli [ 75 ]. This saccular sensitivity, moreover, also has other consequences, as projections from the vestibular system to the autonomic nervous system have been documented at several levels of the nervous system [ 76 , 77 ]. Some of these consequences are affectively-laden, with several effects from nausea and changes in cardiovascular activity to hedonic responses associated with vestibular self-stimulation.…”
Section: Neural Correlates Of Coping With Sounds: Reactive Behaviomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latencies of spike discharges recorded extracelluarly were rather different compared to those recorded intracellularly (inhibition, 4-3 + 4-1 vs. 7-4 + 2-8 ms; excitation, 22 3 + 841 vs. 13-3 + 4-2 ms). This is understandable since the action potential was always evoked after onset of EPSPs with a considerable delay, and the rising phase of some EPSPs were slow (Katafuchi, Puthuraya, Yoshimatsu & Oomura, 1987). Differences between the latencies of IPSPs and those of inhibitory responses recorded extracelluarly may be due to the difficulty in detecting the beginning of inhibition when firing frequency of neurones was very low.…”
Section: Intracellularly Recorded Responses To Fastigial Nucleus Stimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). on the other hand, central motor structures project back to the hypothalamus, such as direct cerebellohypothalamic projections [7,8] and indirect projections from the vestibular nuclei to the hypothalamus [80] , to influence nonsomatic physiological functions. By bridging the non-somatic centers to somatic motor structures and modulating both non-somatic and somatic activity in parallel, the central orexinergic system, together with the circuits from motor structures to non-somatic centers, may actively participate in the orchestration of somatic-non-somatic integration, which is crucial for the generation and execution of appropriate and coordinated behavioral responses (including both somatic and nonsomatic components) to changes in the internal and external environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%