2005
DOI: 10.1670/95-04a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses of Resident Male Dendrobates pumilio to Territory Intruders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Territorial interactions in D. pumilio involve approach by the intruder male and impingement on or near a male's territory followed by a stereotyped series of behaviors, including calling and approaches (pers. obs., Bunnell 1973; Baugh and Forester 1994; Gardner and Graves 2005; Prohl 2005), that can either lead to escalation (physical contact involving chases and wrestling) or submission by the intruder male and subsequent exit from the male's territory. Thus, to score male behaviors, we defined an “interaction zone” as the area within 4 cm (2 body lengths) of each stimulus male, as done previously (Maan and Cummings 2008, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Territorial interactions in D. pumilio involve approach by the intruder male and impingement on or near a male's territory followed by a stereotyped series of behaviors, including calling and approaches (pers. obs., Bunnell 1973; Baugh and Forester 1994; Gardner and Graves 2005; Prohl 2005), that can either lead to escalation (physical contact involving chases and wrestling) or submission by the intruder male and subsequent exit from the male's territory. Thus, to score male behaviors, we defined an “interaction zone” as the area within 4 cm (2 body lengths) of each stimulus male, as done previously (Maan and Cummings 2008, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be particularly true for highly territorial species such as D. pumilio. Male D. pumilio exhibit territory site fidelity (McVey et al 1981) and vigorously defend their sites through vocalizations and close‐range aggressive encounters (Bunnell 1973; Forester et al 1993; Baugh and Forester 1994; Gardner and Graves 2005; Prohl 2005). Thus, the selective pressures imparted by male–male competition may conflict with or facilitate signal divergence mediated by predators or female preference across populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Littlejohn (1965) claimed that differences in call traits between geographically separated populations may equal those between species, which however is not surprising considering that many allopatric species have very similar calls. Gardner & Graves (2005) Divergence in communication signals between populations of the same species or lineage can result from various factors, such as (1) genetic drift (isolation-by-distance hypothesis), (2) natural selection, as adaptations to different habitats and environmental conditions, and (3) sexual selection, reinforcement and reproductive character displacement. In the following sections, we will address some of these influences on geographic call variation in more detail.…”
Section: Variation Among (Geographically Separate) Conspecific Populamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations of naturally occurring mating pairs of O. pumilio were conducted daily from 0600 to 1200 and 1500 to 1700, during the times in which male calling and male/female courtship are most common (Limerick 1980;Gardner & Graves 2005;Willink et al 2014). Males were located by following the sounds of their advertisement calls.…”
Section: Behavioral Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%