Context Boundaries are ubiquitous and may have crucial influence on the pattern, process, and dynamics of landscapes. However, there is little understanding of mechanisms that govern changes in the location and composition of boundaries. Especially, it is still uncertain whether there are definite relationships between vegetation and soil. At smaller scales, investigation of more detailed soil and vegetation characteristics can more clearly reveal the linkages between soil properties and vegetation patterns. Objectives We studied fine-scale characteristics of boundaries between two physiognomically distinct patch types, annual patches and perennial patches, in a saline-alkaline grassland. The aims were to examine the relationship between vegetation patterns and soil properties, and to explore mechanisms that govern changes in the location and composition of boundaries. Methods In a 50 ha grassland fenced for more than ten years and where a recovery process had been initiated and where annual grasses were dominating in most salinealkaline areas, we quantitatively characterized the spatial gradients across the visually-identified physiognomic boundary (subsequently adjusted by hierarchical clustering approach) between the annual patches and perennial patches at a fine spatial scale (220 cm × 50 cm transects consisting of 11 quadrats). We statistically defined the boundaries by the Split Moving Window method based on soil and plant variables. We also applied Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling to assess the relationship between the fine-scale functional 3 patterns and soil properties along the studied environmental gradient. Results At fine scale, the vegetation and soil boundaries were well-defined and statistically characterized by a high rate of change, compared to the immediately adjacent areas. The plant characteristics were markedly influenced by soil properties. The alteration of salinity and alkalinity were the most important factors explaining the plant patterns across the patch boundaries. However, physiognomic vegetation boundaries did not fully coincide with the soil boundaries, nor with statisticallydefined boundary in species richness and biomass. There were successional processes of colonization involved in perennials encroachment in the annual patches. Conclusions Underlying soil properties primarily determine the plant patterns of the boundary; the plant succession caused by interspecific competition is superimposed on the plant-soil feedback loop maintaining soil nutrient conditions. These processes ultimately alter the characteristics and locations of patch boundaries in response to changing disturbance regimes. Our findings offer insight into the processes occurring at the boundary and how the boundary may respond to the changes of environmental conditions and drive landscape-level dynamics.