2004
DOI: 10.2527/2004.8271895x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters1

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Our objective was to estimate responses in growth and carcass traits in the NE Index line (I) that was selected for 19 generations for increased litter size. Differences between Line I and the randomly selected control line (C) were estimated in pure line litters and in F 1 and three-way cross litters produced by mating I and C females with males of unrelated lines. Contrasts of means were used to estimate the genetic difference between I and C and interactions of line differences with mating type. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of response for most traits is in agreement with the results of selection experiments for increased litter size (Noguera et al, 2002b;Petry et al, 2004). Similarly, no significant response in litter size was obtained in several selection experiments for lean growth rate (Fredeen and Mikami, 1986;Cleveland et al, 1988;Kerr and Cameron, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The lack of response for most traits is in agreement with the results of selection experiments for increased litter size (Noguera et al, 2002b;Petry et al, 2004). Similarly, no significant response in litter size was obtained in several selection experiments for lean growth rate (Fredeen and Mikami, 1986;Cleveland et al, 1988;Kerr and Cameron, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Landrace pigs tended to have longer DAYS90 and thicker BF than Yorkshire or Duroc pigs, which might somehow support the evidence of maternal breed selection for bigger litter size as was found out of the experiments of Estany et al (2002). However, Petry et al (2004) could not find any strong evidence of correlated responses in growth performance or in carcass characteristics as responses to selection for litter size. Therefore, paternal or maternal breed differences weekly observed in our study populations cannot be understood as differences in the directions of selection by breeds.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…En el número de lechones destetados influye la supervivencia durante la lactación y la prolificidad o el tamaño de la camada al nacimiento; éste último utilizado también como alternativa en la medida del rendimiento económico (Martínez-Giner et al, 2008). Por ello es habitual que los programas de mejora hagan hincapié en la selección por prolificidad en líneas maternas (Sørensen et al, 2000;Petry et al, 2004). En la bibliografía hay distintas opiniones en cuanto a si la prolificidad en diferentes partos debe ser considerada como medidas repetidas de la misma característica (Southwood y Kennedy, 1990;See et al, 1993;Crump et al, 1997;Lourenço et al, 2008) o como rasgos diferentes (Irgang et al, 1994;Roehe y Kennedy, 1995;Rydhmer et al, 1995;Barbosa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified