2018
DOI: 10.3917/rfap.166.0333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsibility Within Without: The Challenges of Misconduct and Quality Insurance in Scientific research

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Institut national du service public. © Institut national du service public. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a conclusion, it will have to be considered whether and to what extent a complementary approach should be developed alongside the existing one, in which the aim is to assess the integrity and independence of statistics from a global perspective, comparable to the World Press Freedom Index, 20 the Academic Freedom Index 21 or the OECD Public Integrity Maturity Model. 22 In this way, a broader peer community and regular resonance with the public would be generated, a novel institutional design responding to "the wider societal conditions of confidence and trust [41]. "…”
Section: Misuse and Misconduct Trust And Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a conclusion, it will have to be considered whether and to what extent a complementary approach should be developed alongside the existing one, in which the aim is to assess the integrity and independence of statistics from a global perspective, comparable to the World Press Freedom Index, 20 the Academic Freedom Index 21 or the OECD Public Integrity Maturity Model. 22 In this way, a broader peer community and regular resonance with the public would be generated, a novel institutional design responding to "the wider societal conditions of confidence and trust [41]. "…”
Section: Misuse and Misconduct Trust And Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%