Social Costs of Non-Responsible Research

Faucheux, Sylvie; Combe, Caroline Gans; Kuszla, Catherine; O’Connor, Martin

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11458-9_11

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It sought, through a variety of analysis techniques, to provide insights into the incidence of research misconduct, and estimates of economic and scientific benefits that could be derived from a more responsible conduct of research. Project documentation can be found on the DEFORM Project website (https://www.deform-h2020.eu/) and in published papers, notably: Faucheux, Gans Combe and Kuszla (2019); Gans Combe, Faucheux, Kuszla and O'Connor (2018); Kuszla (2019); Petousi and Sifaki (2019).…”

Section: Integrity and Quality In Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The demarcation between public and private becomes blurred, in both directions, to the extent that interpenetrating and "mixed" structures (being various forms of "public-private partnerships) become more and more the norm. These questions are at the heart of the recent interest in "responsible innovation" (Faucheux et al, 2018) which can address, in complementary ways, challenges for private enterprise, social entrepreneurship, public research agencies and their various admixtures.…”

Section: -"Extrinsic" Quality Considerations For Research and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Responsibility Within Without: The Challenges of Misconduct and Quality Insurance in Scientific research

O’Connor¹,

Faucheux²,

Combe³

et al. 2018

Revue Française d'Administration Publique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Institut national du service public. © Institut national du service public. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

Section: Integrity and Quality In Sciencementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: -"Extrinsic" Quality Considerations For Research and Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsibility Within Without: The Challenges of Misconduct and Quality Insurance in Scientific research

O’Connor¹,

Faucheux²,

Combe³

et al. 2018

Revue Française d'Administration Publique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 'social license to operate' [25], which originated in the mining sector and is being adopted in other sectors, such as forestry [26] energy [27], involves engaging and negotiating with local communities regarding the costs and benefits of industrial development, [28] and is, therefore, compatible with and complimentary to an RRI approach. There are growing concerns about irresponsible innovation [29] and the resulting societal costs [30] with the impact of reaching across all industries and communities [31,32]. RRI, however, is a concept that can serve as an umbrella term to bring together a wide range of concepts and ideas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsible Research and Innovation: Using the Requirements Tool for Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Universal Design for Learning Guidelines for Practice

Wilford

2019

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responsible research and innovation (RRI) is growing in importance, and alongside this growth is an acknowledgement that for research and innovation projects to be successful, stakeholders must be involved from the outset. When developing guidelines for practice, stakeholders will often be presented with a document to ratify rather than one to develop or revise. This gap in stakeholder engagement has been recognised and addressed by the development of the requirements tool. This tool was originally created to provide a systematic approach to the development of guidelines for the governance of RRI, but it was quickly recognised that the tool can bridge the gap and involve stakeholders from the outset, thereby increasing the likelihood of buy-in. This paper presents the second validated use of the tool that was used to inform the revision of guidelines for the introduction of a universal design for learning (UDL) at a UK University. The resulting revised guidelines for practice and their adoption by those tasked with producing them provide further evidence of the value and flexibility of the tool and its potential for its continued use in the future development or revision of guidelines.

show abstract

Social Costs of Non-Responsible Research

Cited by 2 publications

References 18 publications

Responsibility Within Without: The Challenges of Misconduct and Quality Insurance in Scientific research

Responsibility Within Without: The Challenges of Misconduct and Quality Insurance in Scientific research

Responsible Research and Innovation: Using the Requirements Tool for Stakeholder Engagement in Developing a Universal Design for Learning Guidelines for Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About