2001
DOI: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsive assessment: assessing student nurses’ clinical competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might also be useful for educators to be familiar with clinical world and managers with academic environment and curricula . Particular attention should be paid to competence assessment processes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might also be useful for educators to be familiar with clinical world and managers with academic environment and curricula . Particular attention should be paid to competence assessment processes .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings revealed cases in which students, tutors and preceptors had different interpretations of the system, both within and between groups. Neary (2001) describes similar variations in assessment from a recent study of student nurse clinical competence. In that case, however, students coped by using such differences to their advantage, which was more of a concern for tutors and practitioners than the students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this overarching philosophy in nursing education, the assessment scale aims to provide a platform for an open and transparent discussion between preceptors and students on the progress of clinical learning (L€ ofmark & Thorell-Ekstrand 2014). As lecturers, preceptors and students often interpret the assessment system differently (Neary 2001), it is crucial to ensure the reliability and validity of the assessment tool (Wu et al 2015a). A structured clinical assessment tool with behavioural cues (Ossenberg et al 2015) would assist the preceptors in enhancing clarity in their assessment and feedback.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%