2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Responsive membranes for hydrophobic interaction chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PVCL-modified membranes achieve a BSA-binding capacity of 5 mg/mL, which is higher than that with nonmodified PVDF membranes and comparable to Sartorius hydrophobic membranes. The IgG-binding capacity is 21 mg/mL or approximately twice that of Sartorius membranes (75,77). To improve membrane performance, Wang and colleagues (78) developed a multimodal cationexchange membrane that employs both Coulombic and hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Hydrophobic and Multimodal Protein Purification Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PVCL-modified membranes achieve a BSA-binding capacity of 5 mg/mL, which is higher than that with nonmodified PVDF membranes and comparable to Sartorius hydrophobic membranes. The IgG-binding capacity is 21 mg/mL or approximately twice that of Sartorius membranes (75,77). To improve membrane performance, Wang and colleagues (78) developed a multimodal cationexchange membrane that employs both Coulombic and hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Hydrophobic and Multimodal Protein Purification Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, membrane capacity is typically lower compared to that of resin. Significant efforts have been dedicated to develop high binding capacity and/or high recovery membrane adsorbers by grafting ligands on membrane substrates using UV-initiated polymerization or atom-transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [24][25][26][27] conjugated a monomeric acid, base or affinity ligand directly to the functional group on the substrate. However, there has been significant work [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][17][18][19] on surface modification by grafting polymers on the flat sheet membrane substrates using ATRP and UV-initiated polymerizations. These results show that there exists an optimal ligand chain density and chain length for maximizing protein binding capacities for IEX, affinity and HIC membrane chromatography [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lysozyme dynamic binding capacity and recovery were determined following the same procedure as before. 29 The amount of protein bound was calculated by subtracting the washed out protein from the amount loaded. Recovery was calculated by dividing the amount of protein eluted by the total amount of protein bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%