2013
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resting, night-time, and 24 h heart rate as markers of cardiovascular risk in middle-aged and elderly men and women with no apparent heart disease

Abstract: In middle-aged subjects with no apparent heart disease, all measures of increased HR were associated with increased mortality and CV risk. However, night-time HR was the only parameter with prognostic importance after multivariable adjustment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
101
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study in middle-aged and elderly persons without manifest heart disease showed that each increment of 5 beats/min resulted in an 11% higher risk all-cause mortality (95% CI: 1-22; P 5 0.033) and a 12% higher rate of cardiovascular events (95% CI: 0-26; P 5 0.044) after 76 months of follow up (40). In our study, approximately 50 cm 2 of VAT was associated with an increase in resting HR of 2.1 beats/min (95% CI: 1.3, 3.0; P < 0.001).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 96%
“…A recent study in middle-aged and elderly persons without manifest heart disease showed that each increment of 5 beats/min resulted in an 11% higher risk all-cause mortality (95% CI: 1-22; P 5 0.033) and a 12% higher rate of cardiovascular events (95% CI: 0-26; P 5 0.044) after 76 months of follow up (40). In our study, approximately 50 cm 2 of VAT was associated with an increase in resting HR of 2.1 beats/min (95% CI: 1.3, 3.0; P < 0.001).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, measurement of resting heart rate is susceptible to numerous factors, 76 and nighttime heart rate was found to be a better prognostic variable relative to resting heart rate and 24-hour heart rate; nighttime heart rate should be a better measure of heart rate because both the interference of sensory input as well as physical and mental activities were minimized. 57 Second, patients with cardiovascular disease or subclinical cardiovascular disease with no antihypertensive treatment at baseline could have started taking heart rate-lowering medications during follow-up, and this would lead to an underestimation of the true magnitude of the observed associations. Third, although we extracted risks that reflected the greatest degree of control for potential confounders, the covariates adjusted and the extent to which they were adjusted varied in the original studies.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 High natural resting heart rate is associated with traditional risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, levels of inflammatory markers [2][3][4] and functional decline, 5 which suggests that resting heart rate might be related to the risk of various disease states. We previously found that resting heart rate was an independent predictor of total mortality related to cardiovascular disease in the general population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%