2005
DOI: 10.17221/4244-cjas
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restoration of a river backwater and its influence on fish assemblage

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The development of fish assemblage in a restored river backwater (Kurfürst backwater, Morava River, Czech Republic) was monitored over a six-year period from its restoration. The structure of fish assemblage remained similar throughout the years. Species richness of adult fish increased from twelve species during the restoration to 20 after it. Initially steady fish abundance (mean 52.3-98.1 inds/ha) and biomass (mean 5.8-7.6 kg/ha) increased significantly in 1999 five years after restoration (576.9 i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the monotypic genus Perca showed comparably low drifting densities, but the perch (P. fluviatilis) is often the most abundant adult percid in the Danube and its backwaters (Schabuss & Reckendorfer, 2002;Loisl et al, 2013). This supports the suggestion of some authors that this species avoids drifting (Reichard et al, 2002b;Zitek et al, 2004b) but may likewise be because of a preference for backwaters, also for reproduction (Schabuss & Reckendorfer, 2002;Hohausova & Jurajda, 2005). At any rate, our results not only show that all percid genera are able to reproduce in the Danube but also illustrate the importance of near-natural shores for spawning and development.…”
Section: Generalsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, the monotypic genus Perca showed comparably low drifting densities, but the perch (P. fluviatilis) is often the most abundant adult percid in the Danube and its backwaters (Schabuss & Reckendorfer, 2002;Loisl et al, 2013). This supports the suggestion of some authors that this species avoids drifting (Reichard et al, 2002b;Zitek et al, 2004b) but may likewise be because of a preference for backwaters, also for reproduction (Schabuss & Reckendorfer, 2002;Hohausova & Jurajda, 2005). At any rate, our results not only show that all percid genera are able to reproduce in the Danube but also illustrate the importance of near-natural shores for spawning and development.…”
Section: Generalsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…A er the year 1989, water quality in the Morava River in Litovelské Pomoraví improved gradually but markedly up to the current state, enabling natural reproduction of the fi sh community (Hohausová & Jurajda, 2005). This process probably had a positive eff ect on the slowly increasing breeding numbers of the Common Kingfi sher in the study area.…”
Section: : Map Of the Study Area Showing Boundaries Of The Litovelskmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Increased spring movements into and out of backwater habitats, likely related to spawning, have been observed in other species (e.g. Hohausová and Jurajda, ), and mass spawning movements have been observed in bigheaded carp at other Illinois River backwaters (ACRCC, ) and present the ideal time to collect individuals exiting backwaters or limit access to main channel spawning habitat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%