Restoration promotes recovery of woodland birds in agricultural environments: A comparison of ‘revegetation’ and ‘remnant’ landscapes

Bennett, Andrew F.; Holland, Greg J.; Haslem, Angie; Stewart, Alistair; Radford, James Q.; Clarke, Rohan H.

doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14148

Cited by 20 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Lanskap alami yang berdekatan diantaranya Taman Nasional Gunung Gede Pangrango (jarak + 18 km) memiliki 250 jenis burung (Mulyana et al, 2015) atau Taman Wisata Alam Telaga Warna (jarak + 8 km) memiliki 40-60 jenis burung (Cholifatullah et al, 2020;Ekowati et al, 2016). Lanskap alami diketahui memiliki keanekaragaman jenis burung lebih tinggi dibandingakan dengan keanekaragaman jenis burung di lanskap pedesaan (Bennett et al, 2022;Sarmiento-Garavito et al, 2022;Chapman & Reich, 2007).…”

Section: B Keanekaragaman Jenis Burungunclassified

“…Tingkat keanekaragaman jenis burung di lanskap pedesaan berada diantara keanekaragaman jenis burung di lanskap alami dan lanskap perkotaan (urban landscape). Jika dibandingkan lanskap alami, maka keanekaragaman jenis burung di lanskap pedesaan lebih rendah (Bennett et al, 2022;Sarmiento-Garavito et al, 2022) (Chapman & Reich, 2007), sementara jika dibandingkan dengan lanskap perkotaan, maka keanekaragaman burung di lanskap pedesaan cenderung lebih tinggi (Mao et al, 2019) (Suarez-Rubio et al, 2016;Vignoli et al, 2013).…”

unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung di Kecamatan Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat

Fajri

Kurnia

2022

Poltanesa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Burung adalah komponen unik ekosistem yang dapat dijumpai di berbagai lanskap termasuk lanskap pedesaan. Dominasi kegiatan pertanian menjadi ciri lanskap ini. Kecamatan Sukmakmur Kabupaten Bogor merupakan lanskap pedesaan yang belum pernah terdapat publikasi berkaitan dengan ornitologi di wilayah ini. Peran penting burung serta manfaatnya bagi lingkungan, menjadikannya alasan penting untuk melakukan penelitian yang terkait dengan keanekaragaman jenis burung di suatu wilayah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi keanekaragaman jenis burung di Kecamatan Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor. Penelitian dilakukan pada Bulan Maret sampai Mei 2021 di delapan tipe habitat yaitu hutan sengon, hutan akasia, kebun campuran, semak belukar, padang rumput, sawah, danau, dan sungai. Data burung diambil dengan metode IPA berukuran diameter 40 meter selama 10 menit. Data habitat diambil dengan mendeskripsikan kondisi vegetasi yang dominan. Data dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk status jenis burung, sementara data kuantitatif dianalisis dengan chi-square, indeks keanekaragaman jenis, dan indeks kemerataan. Keanekaragaman jenis burung yang dijumpai sebanyak 35 jenis dari 22 suku dan 10 ordo tersebar di seluruh tipe habitat. Seluruh jenis burung merupakan catatan baru ornitologi untuk Kecamatan Sukamakmur. Enam jenis burung termasuk dilindungi perundangan Indonesia dan dua jenis termasuk dalam Daftar Apendiks CITES. Satu jenis burung yaitu Ayamhutan hijau (Gallus varius) termasuk jenis unik yang tidak dijumpai pada wilayah lain yang berdekatan sehingga menjadi ciri jenis burung di lanskap pedesaan Kecamatan Sukamakmur. Jenis burung paling banyak ditemukan di habitat kebun campuran dan padang rumput (25 jenis burung), sementara yang paling sedikit adalah habitat sawah (tujuh jenis burung). Tiga jenis burung dapat ditemukan di seluruh tipe habitat. Nilai indeks keanekaragaman jenis burung tertinggi di habitat sungai (H’=2,71) dan terendah di habitat hutan sengon (H’=1,67). Nilai indeks kemerataan jenis burung tertinggi di habitat hutan akasia (E=0,97) dan terendah di habitat sawah (E=0,70).

show abstract

Section: B Keanekaragaman Jenis Burungunclassified

unclassified

Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung di Kecamatan Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat

Fajri

Kurnia

2022

Poltanesa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We tested whether revegetation was successful at restoring bird communities, such that assemblages in plantings diverged away from those in unrestored farmland and converged toward those in reference habitats. This builds on previous work that focused on the avifauna of revegetation sites specifically (Haslem et al, 2021), and complements other contributions examining the landscape-scale benefits of restoration for birds (Bennett et al, 2022;. Here, we examine the following questions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…Study sites were stratified within 23 landscapes, each 800 ha in size. Landscapes were selected to represent distinct gradients in the cover of (1) native vegetation (from ~1% to 19%) and (2) revegetation plantings (from ~1% to 19%) and were at least 2 km apart (see Bennett et al, 2022; In all but three cases, the location of study sites was identical in both sample periods (2006/2007, 2019). Exceptions related to issues with access to private land (two pasture sites) or land-use change between 2006/2007 and 2019 (one woodlot site); these sites were excluded from further consideration.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Temporal dynamics in the composition of bird communities along a gradient of farmland restoration

Haslem,

Clarke,

Maisey

et al. 2024

Ecological Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revegetation plantings are a key activity in farmland restoration and are commonly assumed to support biotic communities that, with time, replicate those of reference habitats. Restoration outcomes, however, can be highly variable and difficult to predict; hence there is value in quantifying restoration success to improve future efforts. We test the expectation that, over time, revegetation will restore bird communities to match those in reference habitats; and assess whether specific planting attributes enhance restoration success. We surveyed birds in 255 sites in south‐east Australia, arranged along a restoration gradient encompassing three habitat types: unrestored farmland (paddocks), revegetation plantings (comprising a chronosequence up to 52 years old) and reference habitats (remnant native vegetation). Surveys were undertaken in 2006/2007 and again in 2019, with data used to compare bird assemblages between habitat types. We also determined whether, in the intervening 12 years, bird communities in revegetation had shifted toward reference habitats on the restoration gradient. Our results showed that each habitat contained a unique bird community and that, over time, assemblages in revegetation diverged away from those in unrestored farmland and converged toward those in reference habitats. Two planting attributes influenced this transition: the bird assemblages of revegetation were more likely to have diverged away from those of unrestored farmland (with scattered mature trees) 12 years later if they were located in areas with more surrounding tree cover, and were mostly ungrazed by livestock (compared with grazed plantings). Our results highlight three key ways in which revegetation contributes to farmland restoration: (1) by supporting richer and more diverse bird assemblages than unrestored farmland, (2) by enhancing beta diversity in rural landscapes through the addition of a unique bird community, and (3) by shifting bird assemblages toward those found in reference habitats over time. However, revegetation plantings did not replicate reference habitats by ~40–50 years in our region, and complete convergence may take centuries. These findings have implications for environmental offset programs and mean that effective conservation in farmland environments depends on the retention and protection of natural and seminatural habitats as a parallel management strategy to complement restoration.

show abstract

“…Managing these invasive plants can have positive ecosystem outcomes for floral (Oliver et al, 2019) and faunal communities (Schlesinger et al, 2020); however, in the absence or paucity of native ecological equivalents, invasive plants can provide important resources, such that broad‐scale control of these species may negatively influence wildlife populations (Elliott et al, 2021). Restoration through revegetation or passive recruitment may take years, even decades or longer, to provide the required vegetation structure or floristic components for species to utilise (Bennett et al, 2022). Hence, substantive negative impacts on wildlife populations could manifest during the interval between control and restoration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Invasive African boneseed and a native shrub support similar faunal assemblages in a heavily infested landscape

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Invasive weeds may provide habitat for wildlife in altered landscapes. We compare fauna within three types of sites in You Yangs Regional Park in central Victoria, Australia, that is, sites with an invasive shrub understory (African boneseed, Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. monilifera (DC.) T. Norl.), native shrub understory (snowy mintbush Prostanthera nivea), and sites without an understory (open sites).Sites with an understory dominated by boneseed provided habitat for avian species and an introduced small mammal, comparable with sites with mintbush as the understory. Species-specific models of common species suggest vegetation structure, rather than composition, drove this effect. Open sites differed in terms of avifaunal assemblage, and the abundance of three common native birds and one common invasive small mammal. Boneseed additionally showed phenological differences in fruiting and flowering and differences in flowering abundance when compared with mintbush, comparably offering resources to wildlife. Transitioning vegetation communities to more natural states should consider wildlife already depending on weeds, a dependency likely driven by a paucity of alternative native vegetation.

show abstract

Restoration promotes recovery of woodland birds in agricultural environments: A comparison of ‘revegetation’ and ‘remnant’ landscapes

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Cited by 20 publications

References 37 publications

Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung di Kecamatan Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat

Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung di Kecamatan Sukamakmur Kabupaten Bogor Provinsi Jawa Barat

Temporal dynamics in the composition of bird communities along a gradient of farmland restoration

Invasive African boneseed and a native shrub support similar faunal assemblages in a heavily infested landscape

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About