2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13679-017-0243-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restrained Eating and Food Cues: Recent Findings and Conclusions

Abstract: Research over the last several years involves both replicating the work showing that restrained eaters respond to attractive food cues by eating more but unrestrained eaters show less responsiveness and extending this work to examine the mechanisms that might underlie this differential responsiveness. Labeling a food as healthy encourages more eating by restrained eaters, while diet-priming cues seem to curtail their consumption even in the face of attractive food cues. Work on cognitive responses indicates th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an environment plays a significant role in biasing control of eating behavior away from innate, internal processes (e.g., physiological hunger and satiety signals) to more external, artificial, or learned behavioral processes (e.g., seeing pictures of desirable foods). Continual exposure to such cues can alter our eating behavior in the short-term by triggering non-homeostatic eating (i.e., eating for reasons other than hunger) ( Lowe and Butryn, 2007 ), or encouraging restriction despite physiological hunger ( Polivy and Herman, 2017 ). While occasional episodes of over- or undereating should be considered part of “normal” eating behavior, over time, these cues may tap into our natural reward-based learning processes to cultivate habits of non-homeostatic eating and/or encourage recurrent binge-purge cycles in some populations ( Burger et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: The Modern Food Environment Sets Us Up For Reward-related Eamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an environment plays a significant role in biasing control of eating behavior away from innate, internal processes (e.g., physiological hunger and satiety signals) to more external, artificial, or learned behavioral processes (e.g., seeing pictures of desirable foods). Continual exposure to such cues can alter our eating behavior in the short-term by triggering non-homeostatic eating (i.e., eating for reasons other than hunger) ( Lowe and Butryn, 2007 ), or encouraging restriction despite physiological hunger ( Polivy and Herman, 2017 ). While occasional episodes of over- or undereating should be considered part of “normal” eating behavior, over time, these cues may tap into our natural reward-based learning processes to cultivate habits of non-homeostatic eating and/or encourage recurrent binge-purge cycles in some populations ( Burger et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: The Modern Food Environment Sets Us Up For Reward-related Eamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women with eating disorders have been found to have an increased tendency to seek pleasurable experiences and avoid negative ones, which may underlie the binge-purge cycle ( Smyth et al, 2007 ; Eneva et al, 2017 ). In regards to non-clinical populations, diet-related food cues (e.g., descriptions of “diet-friendly” food or pictures of thin bodies) tend to reduce food intake among already restrained eaters ( Polivy and Herman, 2017 ), likely driven by the positive reinforcement of working toward or even reaching their body weight goals. Notably, restrained eating is associated with subsequent disinhibited, emotional, and/or binge eating ( Polivy and Herman, 1985 ; Ricca et al, 2009 ; Péneau et al, 2013 ), which may be due to increasing the reinforcing value of food through repeated deprivation ( Epstein et al, 2007 ).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Reward-related Eatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decades of studies of eating in dieters document how dieters can be induced to succumb to temptation and eat more than they planned. Not only do dieters eat more when they have been induced to consume a diet-breaking preload, but their diets are disrupted by emotions [e.g., (1,57,58)], alcohol (24,59), or cognitive load/distraction (60); even merely seeing (19,61,62) or smelling (63) tempting foods can make restrained eaters abandon their diets. These disruptions of dietary restraint lead restrained eaters to abandon their diet goals for at least the short term, and instead to indulge in the foods they have been denying themselves.…”
Section: Personal Norm Violationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En sintonía con la teoría del set point [38], la teoría de la restricción alimentaria argumenta que la conducta de ingesta emocional y/o por estímulos externos, se deriva de dietas restrictivas intensas, originadas en buena medida por presiones sociales. Estas dietas tienen como resultado un hambre persistente que, en un momento de pérdida de autocontrol en situaciones como la experimentación de afectos desagradables o estímulos externos, la conducta alimentaria se ve desinhibida [39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Teoría De La Alimentación Restringidaunclassified