2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted kinematic alignment in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of radiographic and clinical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KA TKA aims to recreate the natural knee joint-line pre-arthritic alignment by restoring the three axes, resulting in natural knee kinematics [ 21 ]. Despite KA’s theoretical advantages, literature results are contradictory because some studies reported improved PROMs [ 22 , 23 ], while others described no significant differences between KA and MA TKA [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KA TKA aims to recreate the natural knee joint-line pre-arthritic alignment by restoring the three axes, resulting in natural knee kinematics [ 21 ]. Despite KA’s theoretical advantages, literature results are contradictory because some studies reported improved PROMs [ 22 , 23 ], while others described no significant differences between KA and MA TKA [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [ 35 38 ]. The PICO(TS) algorithm was preliminary pointed out: P (population): ACL tears; I (intervention): ACL repair; C (comparison): ACL reconstruction; O (outcomes): laxity, PROMs, failures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WOMAC, which is widely used in patients with knee arthritis (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.92), consists of 24 subjective questions about knee joint pain and functional limitations that can be felt daily [ 34 , 35 ]. The evaluation consisted of three subscales: pain, stiffness, and body function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation consisted of three subscales: pain, stiffness, and body function. Therefore, compared to other evaluation tools, the questions were formed on a simple and detailed scale such that knee joint pain and functional impairment can be evaluated very effectively [ 35 ]. In this study, the items on the pain scale ranged from 0–20 points, those on the stiffness scale ranged from 0–8 points, and those on the physical function scale ranged from 0–68 points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%