2007
DOI: 10.1002/qre.873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restricted randomization and multiple responses in industrial experiments

Abstract: Two issues regarding designed experiments are discussed; restrictions on randomization and multiple responses. The former is typically related to hard-to-vary factors and factors appearing in separate stages of a process experiment. Randomization restrictions should be taken into account in the construction of the design as well as in the statistical modelling. In the paper, a case study of sausage production is discussed, having a split-plot model with correlated multiple responses. Multiple responses are han… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To use PLS to analyze the experiment was also considered, but due to the qualitative pellet factor this technique was abandoned. An approach similar to the one we propose, to analyze an experiment with restricted randomization and multiple responses in the food industry, is described in a recent article by Bjerke et al 21 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To use PLS to analyze the experiment was also considered, but due to the qualitative pellet factor this technique was abandoned. An approach similar to the one we propose, to analyze an experiment with restricted randomization and multiple responses in the food industry, is described in a recent article by Bjerke et al 21 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…reduces the negative effect (power loss) of choosing too few components for testing. Another case study, explaining 50-50 MANOVA in further details, is given in Bjerke et al 8 .…”
Section: Statistical Tools: 50-50 Manovamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, factors that involve the press setup will be difficult and time-consuming to change, whereas factors that can be manipulated within a press run will be easier to change. This gives the experiment a split-plot aspect [22][23][24][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] .…”
Section: Randomization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%