1992
DOI: 10.1080/0142569920130102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Restructuring Teacher Education in Australia

Abstract: Debate on teacher quality and quality in teaching and teacher education has been as vigorous in Australia as it has been in the UK and the USA. In Australia, however, reform in teacher education has been subsumed within a national metapolicy of corporate federalism which is an amalgam of beliefs or discourses including neocorporatism, economic rationalism, corporate managerialism and human capital. The paper analyses the most recent document on reform of teacher education in Australia (the Ebbeck Report) and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for an indecipherable future. Here is indeed the end of commodification: the production and reproduction of knowledgeable (or more properly skilled) posthumans in the education industry (Knight, 1992) for the needs of an :111pervasive market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for an indecipherable future. Here is indeed the end of commodification: the production and reproduction of knowledgeable (or more properly skilled) posthumans in the education industry (Knight, 1992) for the needs of an :111pervasive market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accompanying the 1990s expansion of the Australian university sector were considerable pressures for corporate managerial forms of governance (Bartlett, Knight, & Lingard, 1992), which has intensified to the present (Brennan, 2005;Marginson & Considine, 2000). Managerialism is an important change to the university sector, in which, as institutions 'manage' an increasingly prescriptive accountability to Federal government, they become far less autonomous than 20 years ago.…”
Section: Teacher Education Within the University Contextmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Canada, Teacher Education in Ontario: Current Practice and Options for the Future (Fullan & Connelly, 1987) and Preparation Programs in Alberta Universities: Teachers' Evaluations (Greene & Miklos, 1987) are examples of publications produced in nearly every province that have likewise stimulated debate within the academic and wider community. In Australia, a working party of the Australian Education Council (1990), a government discussion paper (Department of Employment, Education, and Training, 1992), and ministerial pronouncements (Beazley, 1993;Ruby, 1993) have fueled the debate in that country by reasserting the apparent shortcomings of teacher education and by proposing reforms (Bartlett, Knight, & Lingard, 1992). In the United Kingdom, new policies for preparing and licensing teachers have been developed and strategies proposed involving more extensive preparation in schools (Beardon, Booth, Hargreaves, & Reiss, 1992;"Schools Seek Cash," 1993;Shaw, 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%