2021
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results and interpretation of a fitting challenge for MR spectroscopy set up by the MRS study group of ISMRM

Abstract: Fitting of MRS data plays an important role in the quantification of metabolite concentrations. Many different spectral fitting packages are used by the MRS community. A fitting challenge was set up to allow comparison of fitting methods on the basis of performance and robustness. Methods: Synthetic data were generated for 28 datasets. Short-echo time PRESS spectra were simulated using ideal pulses for the common metabolites at mostly near-normal brain concentrations. Macromolecular contributions were also inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(103 reference statements)
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, low variance or AICs do not reflect higher accuracy and may rather indicate insufficient responsiveness to real biological variance. The use of simulated spectra as a ground truth is extremely promising as a validation strategy 47 , but can only succeed if synthetic data are truly representative of in-vivo conditions. Another limitation is the single LCM algorithm that we used here, Osprey, which—while conceptually and in performance 6 similar to LCModel does not feature regularization terms on the baseline or the lineshape, and features fewer metabolite soft constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, low variance or AICs do not reflect higher accuracy and may rather indicate insufficient responsiveness to real biological variance. The use of simulated spectra as a ground truth is extremely promising as a validation strategy 47 , but can only succeed if synthetic data are truly representative of in-vivo conditions. Another limitation is the single LCM algorithm that we used here, Osprey, which—while conceptually and in performance 6 similar to LCModel does not feature regularization terms on the baseline or the lineshape, and features fewer metabolite soft constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some further caveats with respect to LCModel fitting (likely also common to other similar spectral fitting software). The contributions from baseline and macromolecules present a potential source of bias, along with linewidth and SNR (see Marja nska et al 43 ). For this report, estimates of baseline and macromolecules are limited to the default LCModel software (version 6.3-1 J).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our simulated dataset, containing 96000 signals, was generated using Eq. 1 and the publicly available metabolite basis set from the ISMRM MRS study group’s fitting challenge (Marjańska et al, 2022) (19 metabolites signals (see Table 1) and one MM signal, 3T, PRESS, TE = 30 ms, spectral width = 4000 Hz, 2048 points). The range of parameters ( A m , Δ α , Δ f , and Δ θ ) were determined according to the literature (Govindaraju et al, 2000; Robin A. de Graaf, 2019) (listed in Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%