2011
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-31-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results from the University of Toronto continuous flow diffusion chamber at ICIS 2007: instrument intercomparison and ice onsets for different aerosol types

Abstract: Abstract. The University of Toronto continuous flow diffusion chamber (UT-CFDC) was used to study heterogeneous ice nucleation at the International Workshop on Comparing Ice Nucleation Measuring Systems (ICIS 2007) which also represented the 4-th ice nucleation workshop, on 14-28 September 2007. One goal of the workshop was to intercompare different ice nucleation measurement techniques using the same aerosol sample source and preparation method. The aerosol samples included four types of desert mineral dust, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
91
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2), and total aerosol surface area as required by the parameterization of Niemand et al (2012). The INP types represented in this comparison are Saharan (SD) and Asian dust (AD2), Canary Island dust (CID), ambient particles (Amb), and sprayed/dried Snomax ™ bacterial particle suspensions, as described by Niemand et al (2012) and Kanji et al (2011). In some cases, the mineral dusts were coated by exposure to secondary organic aerosol formation, noted as "cSOA" in Table 1.…”
Section: Maximum Active Freezing Fractions -Derivation Of Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), and total aerosol surface area as required by the parameterization of Niemand et al (2012). The INP types represented in this comparison are Saharan (SD) and Asian dust (AD2), Canary Island dust (CID), ambient particles (Amb), and sprayed/dried Snomax ™ bacterial particle suspensions, as described by Niemand et al (2012) and Kanji et al (2011). In some cases, the mineral dusts were coated by exposure to secondary organic aerosol formation, noted as "cSOA" in Table 1.…”
Section: Maximum Active Freezing Fractions -Derivation Of Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most abundant minerals occurring in desert aerosols are quartz, calcite, mica, hematite, illite, and gypsum (Kandler et al, 2007). So far, laboratory experiments of heterogeneous freezing have been performed mainly with kaolinite, montmorillonite, and illite (e.g., Hoffer, 1961;Pitter and Pruppacher, 1973;Murray et al, 2011;Pinti et al, 2012, Broadley et al, 2012, and Arizona test dust or several types of natural dust (e.g., Vali, 2008;Connolly et al, 2009;Niedermeier et al, 2011;Kanji et al, 2011;Niemand et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a therefore lie on the water saturation line. Only for Snomax ™ , an artificial snow inducer consisting of freeze-dried Pseudomonas syringae bacteria cells, cell debris and dried culture medium (Lagriffoul et al, 2010), deposition nucleation has been studied extensively (Chernoff and Bertram, 2010;Jones et al, 2011;Kanji et al, 2011;DeMott et al, 2011). More results on freezing experiments with biological particles, also from other habitats, are discussed in Després et al (2012).…”
Section: Primary Biological Aerosol Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%