2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10512-005-0193-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of 16 Years of Testing of Vitrified Intermediate-Level Wastes from the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant

Abstract: Data from a field experiment performed over a period of 16 years at the testing site of the Moscow Scientific and Industrial Association Radon, studying intermediate-level activity K-26 glass with surface storage, are analyzed. The average 137 Cs leach rate was 2.2·10 -7 g/(cm 2 ·day) over 16 years of testing. The effective mutual diffusion coefficient of cesium was found to be 5·10 -21 m 2 /sec and the rate of hydrolysis of the glass framework was found to be 0.1 µm/yr. The calculation showed that the maximum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both ion exchange and hydrolysis contribute to aqueous glass corrosion thus the total rate of released species into the water is given by the sum r i = r xi + r h . Because of rapid dissolution of near surface layers, which are different from the bulk [29,30], there is an additional contribution to this sum termed instantaneous surface dissolution, although this is a short-term transient effect [8,31]. Depending on glass composition and conditions of aqueous corrosion as well as on time the contribution of the two basic mechanisms to the overall corrosion rate, as we will discuss below, can be different.…”
Section: Diffusion-controlled Ion Exchange and Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both ion exchange and hydrolysis contribute to aqueous glass corrosion thus the total rate of released species into the water is given by the sum r i = r xi + r h . Because of rapid dissolution of near surface layers, which are different from the bulk [29,30], there is an additional contribution to this sum termed instantaneous surface dissolution, although this is a short-term transient effect [8,31]. Depending on glass composition and conditions of aqueous corrosion as well as on time the contribution of the two basic mechanisms to the overall corrosion rate, as we will discuss below, can be different.…”
Section: Diffusion-controlled Ion Exchange and Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioactive decay causes an exponential decrease of radionuclide concentrations in nuclear waste glasses. The equations for NMx i and NRx i , accounting for the decay of radioactive species such as 134,137 Cs, are as follows [5,8,31]:…”
Section: Normalised Leaching Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Vitrification of ILWs has received global attention in recent years. [1][2][3]22,[24][25][26][27][28][29] A considerable proportion of ILW, LLW and mixed wastes resemble, in bulk composition and physical form, non-radioactive wastes such as incinerator ashes, sludges and some metal bearing wastes which may be suitable for vitrification. [30][31][32] However, the wide range of chemical and physical forms in which these wastes occur (as outlined above) results in several unique challenges, a number of which have been discussed recently.…”
Section: Introduction To Radioactive Waste Vitrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 However, the study of degradation of glasses buried in natural soils has been mainly focused on predicting the durability of high-level nuclear waste (HLW) glasses and the assessment of the migration of radioactive and nonradioactive species from these glasses into the surrounding soil. [20][21][22][23][24] With regard to the characterization of historical glass degradation, just two experiments have been carried out with silicate glass samples buried in natural, real soils in the field. One experiment involved acidic soil 25 and the other is ongoing at the time of writing and involves basic soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%