2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2809
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of a Phase 1/2 Trial of Chemoradiotherapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost of Radiotherapy Dose in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Abstract: IMPORTANCEEffective treatment options for locally advanced esophageal cancer are limited, and rates of local recurrence after standard chemoradiotherapy remain high.OBJECTIVE To evaluate toxic effects, local control, and overall survival rates after chemoradiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost of radiotherapy dose to the gross tumor and nodal disease for patients with unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA phase 1/2, single-arm trial was conducted in 46 pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with a recent phase I/II trial of chemoradiotherapy with SIB radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced EC (95% PGTV/PTV = 63.00 Gy/50.40 Gy/28 f, EQD2 = 64.31 Gy), our study had a better median OS, lower 1-year local recurrence rates, and similar 1-year OS and 1-year local recurrence rates (21.5 months, 30%, and 78.3% respectively) [36]. However, all of these studies require long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared with a recent phase I/II trial of chemoradiotherapy with SIB radiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced EC (95% PGTV/PTV = 63.00 Gy/50.40 Gy/28 f, EQD2 = 64.31 Gy), our study had a better median OS, lower 1-year local recurrence rates, and similar 1-year OS and 1-year local recurrence rates (21.5 months, 30%, and 78.3% respectively) [36]. However, all of these studies require long-term follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In contrast, the SIB-IMRT dose for the primary treatment area is controversial. The fractionated dose varies from 1.8 to 2.8 Gy; the total dose, from 62.5 Gy to 70 Gy; and the number of fractions, from 25 to 36, which re ects a wide variation [37][38][39] [24]. However, in the above study, the patients treated with this dose range (2.2-2.25 Gy/62.5-66 Gy/25-30 f) may be highly selected, for example, patients in whom the primary tumor was not sensitive to treatment, especially patients with EC who showed insigni cant tumor regression during radiotherapy; or no signs of ulcer perforation without T4 stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because the distant metastasis rate was low (28.4%), and most distant metastases (72.0%) were combined with local‐regional recurrences. Another radiation dose escalation method, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), has also been explored; local control of 67.5%‐78.6% was reported . However, local control of ESCC was not improved by SIB, compared with standard dose .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The planning target volume (PTV) encompassed the CTV plus a 0.5-1 cm margin. All patients received simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) radiotherapy, which had been reported in a recent phase 1/2 trial conducted by Chen et al (26). The prescribed dose was 60-66 Gy to GTV in 28-30 fractions, five fractions per week, and at least 50.4 Gy to CTV in 28 fractions, five fractions per week.…”
Section: Radiotherapy Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%