2006
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000243287.91167.a7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of Surgical Resection for Progression of Brain Metastases Previously Treatedby Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The local outcome was categorized as either LC (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) or LF (progressive disease) based on the response determined in the last follow-up session. Using serial imaging (including perfusion MRI) and/or histological confirmation, the adverse radiation effect (ARE) was diagnosed and distinguished from local progression [ 25 ], based on the report by Sneed et al [ 11 ]. Following these criteria, a total of 93 and 63 lesions were classified as LC and LF, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local outcome was categorized as either LC (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) or LF (progressive disease) based on the response determined in the last follow-up session. Using serial imaging (including perfusion MRI) and/or histological confirmation, the adverse radiation effect (ARE) was diagnosed and distinguished from local progression [ 25 ], based on the report by Sneed et al [ 11 ]. Following these criteria, a total of 93 and 63 lesions were classified as LC and LF, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the first domain of the QUADAS-2 criteria, shown in supplementary Fig. 1.A, patient selection showed a high risk of bias in 12 out of 37 studies [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. Some of these studies used selection criteria which could induce bias, such as excluding patients who used dexamethasone or showed clinical deterioration [33,34].…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the index test domain, 16 out of 37 studies showed a high risk of bias, because for these studies it was unknown if the results of the index test were interpreted with or without knowledge of the reference test [30,35,36,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. Also, in many studies (n = 17), a predefined cut-off value of the index test was missing [30,31,[33][34][35][36][37][38]41,42,[44][45][46][53][54][55][56]. In the reference test domain, 9 out of 37 studies showed a high risk of bias [30,31,33,37,47,50-5 2,57], mainly because of the choice of the reference test.…”
Section: Methodological Quality Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations