2014
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/5/539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Results of the evaluation and preliminary validation of a primary LNG mass flow standard

Abstract: LNG custody transfer measurements at large terminals have been based on ship tank level gauging for more than 50 years. Flow meter application has mainly been limited to process control in spite of the promise of simplified operations, potentially smaller uncertainties and better control over the measurements for buyers. The reason for this has been the lack of LNG flow calibration standards as well as written standards. In the framework of the EMRP ‘Metrology for LNG’ project, Van Swinden Laboratory (VSL) has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the moment, there are only few facilities able to operate at cryogenic temperatures and, mainly, using liquid nitrogen [2][3]. Probably soon, there will be the possibility to operate with LNG and the situation will improve but, even in this case, the calibration procedure will request to stop the line at the production site, to dismount and to deliver flowmeters, periodically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment, there are only few facilities able to operate at cryogenic temperatures and, mainly, using liquid nitrogen [2][3]. Probably soon, there will be the possibility to operate with LNG and the situation will improve but, even in this case, the calibration procedure will request to stop the line at the production site, to dismount and to deliver flowmeters, periodically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are challenges that are inherent for all CFMs, including environment temperature, zero shift, and external vibration influence. The complex of these challenges leads to the lower CFM accuracy for cryogenic fluids than for water, which was reported in [3]. While new CFM configurations may be developed to address these challenges, the calibration of them is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%