Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose of the study. The study’s objective is to investigate the influence of risk factors for recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical surgical treatment on the unfavourable course of recurrence of the disease with the formation of a set of the most significant factors of a model that reflects the likelihood of relapse.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of clinical, pathomorphological and perioperative parameters of 803 patients with PCa after radical prostatectomy was carried out. By means of logistic regression, a model for assessing the risk of recurrence for patients with prostate cancer was built, which included 7 indicators, one of which was measured by quantity (time between biopsy and start of treatment) and six categorical ones (ISUP grade group, cT, cN+, positive surgical margin, PSA level after surgery, pN+). The construction of a logistic regression model consisted in obtaining a characteristic of the logistic function Ψ for the standard equation y = exp(ψ) / (1 + exp(ψ)).Results. Substituting the coefficients obtained for each of the indicators, we obtain Ψ to assess the risk of relapse Ψ = 0.485 × X1+ 1.937 × X2 + 0.789 × X3 + 3.229 × X4 + 0.443 × X5 + 0.880 × X6 + 0.015 × X7–6.65. In the resulting formula, each of the regression coefficients describes the size of the contribution of the corresponding factor. In our case, all regression coefficients were positive, which means that this factor increases the overall risk of relapse. The quality of the resulting model is determined by the chi-square = 284.3; p < 0.001; OR = 28.45. The sensitivity of this model was 86.6 %, specificity 81.5 %, diagnostic accuracy 82.7 %.Conclusion. This model makes it possible to obtain the probability of recurrence after radical prostatectomy depending on the severity of a specific set of predictive signs (a positive effect is predicted for y > 0.5, a negative one for y ≤ 0.5) and the degree of influence of one or a group of predictive signs on the likelihood of relapse, such as the ISUP grade group, locally advanced disease, clinically detectable lymph node lesion, positive surgical margin, PSA level of more than 0.09 ng/ml 1 month after surgery, the presence of regional metastases and the time between biopsy and the start of treatment.
Purpose of the study. The study’s objective is to investigate the influence of risk factors for recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical surgical treatment on the unfavourable course of recurrence of the disease with the formation of a set of the most significant factors of a model that reflects the likelihood of relapse.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of clinical, pathomorphological and perioperative parameters of 803 patients with PCa after radical prostatectomy was carried out. By means of logistic regression, a model for assessing the risk of recurrence for patients with prostate cancer was built, which included 7 indicators, one of which was measured by quantity (time between biopsy and start of treatment) and six categorical ones (ISUP grade group, cT, cN+, positive surgical margin, PSA level after surgery, pN+). The construction of a logistic regression model consisted in obtaining a characteristic of the logistic function Ψ for the standard equation y = exp(ψ) / (1 + exp(ψ)).Results. Substituting the coefficients obtained for each of the indicators, we obtain Ψ to assess the risk of relapse Ψ = 0.485 × X1+ 1.937 × X2 + 0.789 × X3 + 3.229 × X4 + 0.443 × X5 + 0.880 × X6 + 0.015 × X7–6.65. In the resulting formula, each of the regression coefficients describes the size of the contribution of the corresponding factor. In our case, all regression coefficients were positive, which means that this factor increases the overall risk of relapse. The quality of the resulting model is determined by the chi-square = 284.3; p < 0.001; OR = 28.45. The sensitivity of this model was 86.6 %, specificity 81.5 %, diagnostic accuracy 82.7 %.Conclusion. This model makes it possible to obtain the probability of recurrence after radical prostatectomy depending on the severity of a specific set of predictive signs (a positive effect is predicted for y > 0.5, a negative one for y ≤ 0.5) and the degree of influence of one or a group of predictive signs on the likelihood of relapse, such as the ISUP grade group, locally advanced disease, clinically detectable lymph node lesion, positive surgical margin, PSA level of more than 0.09 ng/ml 1 month after surgery, the presence of regional metastases and the time between biopsy and the start of treatment.
Introduction. To date, the impact of the time interval from diagnostic prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy on treatment outcomes remains a topical issue.Objective. To evaluate the effect of the timespan from diagnosis to radical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on tumor morphology and long-term oncological outcomes.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of patients with high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy from 2001 to 2019 in three St. Petersburg clinics was performed. The influence of the time interval from prostate biopsy to radical treatment on long-term outcomes was assessed.Results. An increase in the time interval before surgical treatment over three months did not affect the tumor morphology. Five-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 79.7%, 67.8% and 52.5% among patients with time interval from biopsy to surgical treatment less than 30 days, 30 – 90 days and more than 90 days, respectively. The time interval prior to radical treatment did not have any effect on overall and cancer-specific survival.Conclusion. The time interval from prostate biopsy to surgical intervention, not exceeding 3 months, is the most favorable with respect to long-term outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.