Introduction. To date, the impact of the time interval from diagnostic prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy on treatment outcomes remains a topical issue.Objective. To evaluate the effect of the timespan from diagnosis to radical treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients on tumor morphology and long-term oncological outcomes.Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the results of treatment of patients with high-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy from 2001 to 2019 in three St. Petersburg clinics was performed. The influence of the time interval from prostate biopsy to radical treatment on long-term outcomes was assessed.Results. An increase in the time interval before surgical treatment over three months did not affect the tumor morphology. Five-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 79.7%, 67.8% and 52.5% among patients with time interval from biopsy to surgical treatment less than 30 days, 30 – 90 days and more than 90 days, respectively. The time interval prior to radical treatment did not have any effect on overall and cancer-specific survival.Conclusion. The time interval from prostate biopsy to surgical intervention, not exceeding 3 months, is the most favorable with respect to long-term outcomes.

No abstract

Objective: to assess safety, pathological response rate, and long-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy using docetaxel in prostate cancer (PCa) patients of high and very high risk groups. Materials and methods: 86 patients with high and very high risk PCa (PSA>20 ng/ml, Gleason score 8 and more, or clinical stage cT2c and more) were included, among them 46 received neoadjuvant (NCGT/RP group) treatment followed by RP and 40 patients received RP only. with a median follow-up of 11.4 years after RP. Neoadjuvant treatment included 3-weekly docetaxel (75 mg/m2 for up to 6 cycles) with concomitant degarelix (6 monthly injections). Results: NCGT cycle was started in 39 patients and completed in full dose and planned regimen in 34 (87.2%) patients. Toxicities were moderate. A statistically significant reduction of PSA>50% post-chemohormonal therapy was observed in all 39 cases. Among patients with completed neoadjuvant treatment RP was performed in 33 (97.1%) patients. Lower postoperative stage was noticed in 38.5% in NCGT/RP group compared with 2.7% in RP group. Similarly, positive surgical margin rate was higher in group without neoadjuvant therapy - 43.2% and 25.6% (RP group). Adjuvant or deferred treatment received 25 (67.6%) and 13 (39.4%) in RP and NCGT/RP group, respectively. Conclusion: The use of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy before the RP in selected regimen and dose represents a safe strategy resulting in benefit in early oncological results. Given the limitations of the study this concept should be evaluated in large prospective controlled studies.

Background. High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) occurs in 15-25 % of newly diagnosed cases and is a life-threatening condition that requires active treatment. In recent years, the percentage of high-risk PCa has significantly increased, as well as the number of prostatectomies performed in patients with unfavorable morphologic features. However, the high-risk group criteria are not fully defined yet. According to various medical associations, a locally advanced or localized disease may have a high risk of progression. Study objective: to evaluate early and long-term results of treatment of patients with high-risk PCa depending on the high-risk group criteria. Materials and methods. The analysis includes results of radical surgical treatment of 832 patients with localized or locally advanced high-risk PCa treated in three medical institutions in St. Petersburg in the period from 2001 to 2019. Clinically high-risk group included patients with one of the following criteria: prostate specific antigen level >20 ng/ml, Gleason score >8, stage (cT); according to the last criterion two groups of patients were identified: HR-EAU (≥cT2c; n = 408) and HR-NCCN (≥cT3a; n = 282). Results. The average prostate specific antigen level was 21.09 and 26.63 ng/ml, respectively, in HR-EAU and HR-NCCN groups (p< 0.0001). The incidence of positive surgical margin, positive lymph nodes (pN+), five-year recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival did not differ significantly between the clinically high-risk groups. When evaluated according to the criteria obtained from pathomorphological examination of the removed prostate, the HR-NCCN group showed higher frequency of positive surgical margin (24.8 % vs. 19.2 %) and frequency of pN+ (22.4 % vs. 10.4 %). Analysis of long-term outcomes showed less favorable 5-year results in the HR-NCCN group (recurrence-free, cancerspecific, overall survival - 54.8, 87.0, 83.7 %) compared to the HR-EAU group (recurrence-free, cancer-specific, overall survival - 71.0, 92.1, 88.2 %) (p <0.02 for all). Conclusion. Differences in the high-risk group criteria by clinical indicators between associations do not affect early (frequency of positive surgical margin, pN+) and long-term (recurrence-free, cancer-specific, overall survival) outcomes. Pathomorphological indicators are less favorable when evaluated according to NCCN. According to our results, any of the proposed models can be used before radical prostatectomy to determine the prognosis of high-risk PCa patients. However, the NCCN morphological prognostic factors allow better prediction of outcomes and, in accordance with them, prescribe treatment that corresponds to the aggressiveness of the disease.

Background. Prostate cancer is the most common malignant condition among oncological diseases of the genitourinary tract, which occupies the second place in male mortality from malignant neoplasms. At the same time, population of patients with prostate cancer is heterogeneous: in some patients, the disease does not require active treatment, while in others it progresses rapidly with the formation of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Therefore, the search for new predictive markers remains relevant.Objective. Analysis of the prognostic significance of the loss of heterozygosity of PTEN, RB1, TP53, BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer.Materials and methods. The study included 52 patients with prostate cancer, 31 (59.6 %) of whom had a localized form (T1-2N0M0), and 21 (40.4 %) - locally advanced (T3a-bN0/1M0). All patients underwent radical prostatectomy, followed by genotyping of postoperative and biopsy specimens to determine genetic alterations in the studied genes. Detection of deletions in the studied genes was carried out using the method of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.Results. In 13 (25.0 %) patients in the postoperative specimen was detected deletion of PTEN gene, in 6 (11.5 %) - deletion of RB1 gene, and in 1 (1.9 %) - deletion of BRCA2 gene. At the same time, patients with loss of PTEN heterozygosity were more likely to have perineural invasion (p = 0.01) and lymph node involvement (p = 0.0003). Deletion of RB1 gene is associated with more frequent detection of high-grade tumors (p = 0.013), cribriform growth component (p = 0.002), and invasion of the periprostatic tissue (p = 0.005).Conclusion. Detection of loss of heterozygosity of PTEN and RB1 genes is a promising tool for clarifying the prognosis of the disease, which in the future will allow more accurately stratify patients into risk groups for biochemical relapse.