Results with the Roseland® HAC trapeziometacarpal prosthesis after more than 10 years

Semere, Alessandro; Vuillerme, Nicolas; Corcella, D.; Forli, Alexandra; Moutet, F.

doi:10.1016/j.main.2015.01.004

Cited by 56 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on data published up to 2014 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], the TMC prosthesis revision rate is 11.1% with a mean follow-up of 6 years.…”

Section: General Observations and Study Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases

Bricout

Rezzouk

2016

Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Based on data published up to 2014 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8], the TMC prosthesis revision rate is 11.1% with a mean follow-up of 6 years.…”

Section: General Observations and Study Impactmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Prosthetic dislocation is the most common cause of early revisions [8] and is the most difficult one to manage. The fact that the implant dislocates brings into question the surgeon's work and also the appropriateness of the surgical indication for the patient's condition.…”

Section: Dislocation and Instabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases

Bricout

Rezzouk

2016

Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…2014, Martin-Ferrero 2014, Semere et al. 2015). These long-term survival rates are inferior to those for total knee replacement (89–95%) and total hip replacement (96–100%) (Hallan et al.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purposeRadiostereometric analysis (RSA) is an accurate method for measurement of early migration of implants. Since a relation has been shown between early migration and future loosening of total knee and hip prostheses, RSA plays an important role in the development and evaluation of prostheses. However, there have been few RSA studies of the upper limb, and the value of RSA of the upper limb is not yet clear. We therefore performed a systematic review to investigate the accuracy and precision of RSA of the upper limb.Patients and methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed and the protocol for this review was published online at PROSPERO under registration number CRD42016042014. A systematic search of the literature was performed in the databases Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, Cinahl, and Google Scholar on April 25, 2015 based on the keywords radiostereometric analysis, shoulder prosthesis, elbow prosthesis, wrist prosthesis, trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis, humerus, ulna, radius, carpus. Articles concerning RSA for the analysis of early migration of prostheses of the upper limb were included. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS score, Downs and Black checklist, and the ISO RSAResults23 studies were included. Precision values were in the 0.06–0.88 mm and 0.05–10.7° range for the shoulder, the 0.05–0.34 mm and 0.16–0.76° range for the elbow, and the 0.16–1.83 mm and 11–124° range for the TMC joint. Accuracy data from marker- and model-based RSA were not reported in the studies included.InterpretationRSA is a highly precise method for measurement of early migration of orthopedic implants in the upper limb. However, the precision of rotation measurement is poor in some components. Challenges with RSA in the upper limb include the symmetrical shape of prostheses and the limited size of surrounding bone, leading to over-projection of the markers by the prosthesis. We recommend higher adherence to RSA guidelines and encourage investigators to publish long-term follow-up RSA studies.

show abstract

“…Another and more recent surgical option is total prosthesis, which preserves strength and respects TMC joint kinematics. With the usual ball-and-socket design, patients obtain faster and better pain relief, stronger grip function, and shorter convalescence than with trapeziectomy [8,9]. However, there are also many reports of poor results [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trapeziometacarpal Joint: A Mechanical Explanation of Total Prosthesis Failures

Spartacus¹

2019

Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Total prosthesis, which preserves strength and respects trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint range of motion, is a surgical option considered for the TMC joint replacement. With the usual ball-and-socket design, patients obtain faster pain relief, stronger grip function, and shorter convalescence than with trapeziectomy. However, prostheses currently used have led to various early complications, especially in active and young patients. Revisions are most often due to the loosening of the trapezium cup and of the metacarpal stem and to the luxation of the first metacarpal bone. The short lifespan of these devices suggests the difficulty of designing a prosthesis that respects the complex anatomy and motions of the TMC joint. Early implant failure may reflect the fact that the current devices do not exactly replicate the true kinematics. The aim of this chapter will be to shed light mechanical explanations for TMC prosthesis failures in regard to the complex kinematics of the joint.

show abstract

Results with the Roseland® HAC trapeziometacarpal prosthesis after more than 10 years

Cited by 56 publications

References 25 publications

Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases

Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases

The accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in upper limb arthroplasty

Trapeziometacarpal Joint: A Mechanical Explanation of Total Prosthesis Failures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About