2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb07050.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resumption of Right Atrial Isthmus Conduction Following Atrial Flutter Radiofrequency Ablation

Abstract: BRU, P., ET AL.: Resumption of Right Atrial Isthmus Conduction Following Atrial Flutter Radiofrequency Ablation. Right atrial isthmus block is currently accepted as a success criterion of atrial flutter ablation. An electrophysiological study performed days after the ablation procedure may show recovery of con duction across the isthmus in some patients, followed by arrhythmia recurrence. However, few data are available on the time course of this recovery and on the monitoring of isthmus conduction at the end … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The status of the bidirectional block was assessed continuously over the 30-minute period after bidirectional block occurrence. Thirty minutes after the bidirectional block was validated, 18 all patients underwent a postablation control by burst pacing at cycle lengths as short as 180 ms. On occasion, conduction resumed after ablation, which reinitiated a complete RFA sequence until the bidirectional block could be observed again, resetting the 30-minute waiting period. A cumulative time of RF delivery was recorded, and fluoroscopy time was calculated as total fluoroscopy time used for catheter positioning and RFA, including time to proof of bidirectional block.…”
Section: Catheter Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status of the bidirectional block was assessed continuously over the 30-minute period after bidirectional block occurrence. Thirty minutes after the bidirectional block was validated, 18 all patients underwent a postablation control by burst pacing at cycle lengths as short as 180 ms. On occasion, conduction resumed after ablation, which reinitiated a complete RFA sequence until the bidirectional block could be observed again, resetting the 30-minute waiting period. A cumulative time of RF delivery was recorded, and fluoroscopy time was calculated as total fluoroscopy time used for catheter positioning and RFA, including time to proof of bidirectional block.…”
Section: Catheter Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrespective of the group, the procedure global endpoint was the achievement of a bidirectional block across the CTI, established by the following criteria: 1) clockwise block along CTI ablation site was validated by the recording of split double potentials (>90 ms) separated by an isoelectric segment during pacing from proximal CS; and 2) counter‐clockwise block along CTI ablation site was validated by the decrement in the timing of the terminal atrial component during differential pacing from the low to the high RA . Of note, if bidirectional block status was maintained over 20 minutes after the last RF application, the procedure was deemed successful …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite these validation methods, several studies and national registries suggest that RF ablation of AFl is still associated with a 10% recurrence rate . Most of these recurrences are associated with very early CTI conduction recovery after RF application . Despite the lack of any long‐term study with clinical follow‐up, it is currently recommended to observe a period of 30 minutes after RF application in order to check for early reconduction and reablation if necessary …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these recurrences are associated with very early CTI conduction recovery after RF application . Despite the lack of any long‐term study with clinical follow‐up, it is currently recommended to observe a period of 30 minutes after RF application in order to check for early reconduction and reablation if necessary …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%