1994
DOI: 10.1109/8.309997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retarded time absorbing boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FDTD method was applied to numerically solve the governing Maxwells equations. The simulations were performed on a cubic grid of 5‐mm resolution applying retarded‐time absorbing boundary conditions resulting in a time step of 8.3 ps (18). All simulations were carried out on an in‐house developed FDTD platform (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDTD method was applied to numerically solve the governing Maxwells equations. The simulations were performed on a cubic grid of 5‐mm resolution applying retarded‐time absorbing boundary conditions resulting in a time step of 8.3 ps (18). All simulations were carried out on an in‐house developed FDTD platform (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…into account the thickness of the blood cell layer and the dilution of the blood in the culture medium (18)(19)(20). The permittivity and conductivity of the cell culture were measured using an HP 85070A probe (blood data from report cited as footnote 4).…”
Section: Exposure Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local error obtained in a vacuum space of 100 2 50 2 100 cubical cells terminated with a 16-layer PML is compared with that obtained by the use of Mur second-order boundary condition [4]. As a new feature, the local error obtained with the retarded time (RT) boundary condition [5] for the same test case is also considered. A pulse source centered in the vacuum space for 100 time steps of simulation was considered exactly as prescribed in [2].…”
Section: Index Terms-fdtd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, again, the integral limits are chosen for a better matching with the stair-step approximation actually used in the FDTD. For the composite error due to the presence of the PML boundary, we can write therefore E = R + jE FDTD j: (5) In Fig. 2(b), (5) is plotted as a function of n for the various PML thicknesses.…”
Section: Index Terms-fdtd Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%