2012
DOI: 10.1002/etc.1750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention and maternal transfer of environmentally relevant polybrominated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins and dibenzofurans, polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins and dibenzofurans, and polychlorinated biphenyls in zebrafish (Danio rerio) after dietary exposure

Abstract: High levels of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), mono- and non-ortho-polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PBDDs) are found in fish from coastal areas in the Baltic Sea, which may cause ecotoxicological effects. To increase our understanding of the persistency of the emerging pollutants polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs), fish feed was spiked with 21 PBDD/Fs, 17 PCDD/Fs, and 30 PCBs and fed to zebrafish (Danio rerio). Conc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…59 A generally applicable screening criterion is that AEs > 1.0 (100%) are suspect indicating a source of error and are thus classified L. Plausible explanations for AE > 1.0 are the (bio)formation of the chemical in the organism (or perhaps the GIT) or additional unintentional exposure during the test or analytical errors. In some cases AE values >1.0 are reported for certain chemicals for which bioformation is not expected to occur 102 and there is no obvious explanation. Measured doses (quantities for C D and I) are required for H classification for most AE data (76% of the entries).…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 A generally applicable screening criterion is that AEs > 1.0 (100%) are suspect indicating a source of error and are thus classified L. Plausible explanations for AE > 1.0 are the (bio)formation of the chemical in the organism (or perhaps the GIT) or additional unintentional exposure during the test or analytical errors. In some cases AE values >1.0 are reported for certain chemicals for which bioformation is not expected to occur 102 and there is no obvious explanation. Measured doses (quantities for C D and I) are required for H classification for most AE data (76% of the entries).…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chronic exposure to PCDD/Fs resulted in high concentrations in blood of workers in Agbogbloshie . Meanwhile, despite the high contamination levels of PBDFs in Agbogbloshie, the contribution of these brominated dioxins to the total dioxin exposure risk is still unclear considering the potentially lower bioaccessibility and shorter half life. , Nevertheless, because significant dioxin-like activities were detected in the brominated dioxin fraction (rather than in the chlorinated dioxin fraction) of several randomly selected serum samples from Agbogbloshie e-waste workers (Table S6), further studies on the potential health effects of brominated dioxins in e-waste workers are warranted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although lower brominated PBDD/F congeners can naturally form through photochemical and biosynthetic pathways (Haglund, 2010;Arnoldsson et al, 2012), the major sources of PBDD/Fs are thermal industrial activities, such as metallurgical processes, solid waste incineration, and electronic waste dismantling (Du et al, 2010;Gullett et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010b;Duan et al, 2011;Chang et al, 2013;Chang et al, 2014). Widespread use of brominated flame retardants (BFRs), including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and tetrabromobisphenol A, provides an abundance of bromines for PBDD/F formation in industrial processes (Weber and Bertram, 2003;Wang et al, 2010a;Wyrzykowska-Ceradini et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%