2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of front-line staff in child welfare: A systematic review of research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The question of how to organise an initial 'sheltered' time at the workplace where the newly educated social worker can learn on-the-job before having to take full responsibility is neither new nor easy to solve. The reality of high turnover, vacancies and many newly educated social workers at the same workplace (Blomberg, Kallio, Kroll, & Saarinen, 2014;de Panfilis & Zlotnik, 2008;Tham, 2007;Tham & Meagher, 2009;Travis, Lizano, & Mor Barak, 2016;Webb & Carpenter, 2012) do not provide the best opportunities for giving new practitioners the sheltered time, support and guidance they would have needed. Initiatives such as the newly qualified child and family social workers (NQSWs) programme in England to support new practitioners to build their skills, competence and self-confidence in the first year of practice and an assessed and supported year in employment (ASYE) arising from this programme are promising developments (Carpenter et al, 2015;Social Work Reform Board, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of how to organise an initial 'sheltered' time at the workplace where the newly educated social worker can learn on-the-job before having to take full responsibility is neither new nor easy to solve. The reality of high turnover, vacancies and many newly educated social workers at the same workplace (Blomberg, Kallio, Kroll, & Saarinen, 2014;de Panfilis & Zlotnik, 2008;Tham, 2007;Tham & Meagher, 2009;Travis, Lizano, & Mor Barak, 2016;Webb & Carpenter, 2012) do not provide the best opportunities for giving new practitioners the sheltered time, support and guidance they would have needed. Initiatives such as the newly qualified child and family social workers (NQSWs) programme in England to support new practitioners to build their skills, competence and self-confidence in the first year of practice and an assessed and supported year in employment (ASYE) arising from this programme are promising developments (Carpenter et al, 2015;Social Work Reform Board, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other variables were also examined as possible confounding covariates. Years of experience in child welfare work, salary, and social work degree were considered because they were found to be related to worker outcomes in previous studies (Barth et al 2008;DePanfilis and Zlotnik 2008;Dickinson and Perry 2002;Manlove and Guzell 1997;Smith 2005). For example, years of work experience was a predictor of retention in the studies of Manlove and Guzell (1997) as well as Smith (2005).…”
Section: Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In considering the Global Agenda we should consider whether faced with such a powerful economic approach of neoliberalism, and a profession which is often uncritical, reticent to claim credit for its achievements (Jones and Truell, 2012), impacted by low morale and confidence of social work practitioners (DePanfilis and Zlotnik, 2008;Jones, 2005) and a failure to engage at a policy level have resulted in the profession (unconsciously or consciously) aiding neoliberal policy reform (Lorenz, 2005)?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%