Abstract:The retention of motor skill has been studied by numerous experimenters since the early work of Book and Swift on typewriting in which a high degree of retention was found even after a lapse of two years. A summary of significant studies on longtime retention in motor skills has been made by McGeoch (2).A study (i) of the effect of rest pauses of varying lengths interpolated early and late in learning on the acquisition of pursuit rotor skill has been reported by the writer. In this investigation 457 subjects … Show more
“…Thus, Lewis & Lowe (1956) after 3 months observed nearly 100% retention with the help of a complex coordinator. Similar results have been reported by others (Bell, 1950;Jahnke & Duncan, 1956;Battig et al, 1957;Ellis, Pryer & Barnett, 1960;Ammons et al, 1958) with other test forms and evaluation methods.…”
Section: (4) Individual Ability To Perform the Ma-test After A Periodsupporting
A study has been carried out to investigate the constancy of results in oral recognition of forms (RF-test) and in tests which demand a fine coordination of the oral muscular apparatus (MA-test). Twenty examinees with a mean age of 22.5 years were tested with both test forms in 1972 and retested 4 years later in 1976. The performances in the RF- as well as in the MA-test improved considerably. As to the learning (training) effect in both test forms, the test results acquired by training during the previous period have largely been preserved until the next test period 4 years later. Individuals with a given capacity to perform either the RF- or MA-test, showed about the same grade of ability 4 years later. The RF- as well as the MA-test seem to reflect a given ability, which, at least in this age-group, remained constant during a period of 4 years. These results may be explained by reference to the notion of schema in which some motor-sensory feed-back will be stored. The specificity of the perceptual and motor patterns used, may have produced schemata with good resistance against forgetting.
“…Thus, Lewis & Lowe (1956) after 3 months observed nearly 100% retention with the help of a complex coordinator. Similar results have been reported by others (Bell, 1950;Jahnke & Duncan, 1956;Battig et al, 1957;Ellis, Pryer & Barnett, 1960;Ammons et al, 1958) with other test forms and evaluation methods.…”
Section: (4) Individual Ability To Perform the Ma-test After A Periodsupporting
A study has been carried out to investigate the constancy of results in oral recognition of forms (RF-test) and in tests which demand a fine coordination of the oral muscular apparatus (MA-test). Twenty examinees with a mean age of 22.5 years were tested with both test forms in 1972 and retested 4 years later in 1976. The performances in the RF- as well as in the MA-test improved considerably. As to the learning (training) effect in both test forms, the test results acquired by training during the previous period have largely been preserved until the next test period 4 years later. Individuals with a given capacity to perform either the RF- or MA-test, showed about the same grade of ability 4 years later. The RF- as well as the MA-test seem to reflect a given ability, which, at least in this age-group, remained constant during a period of 4 years. These results may be explained by reference to the notion of schema in which some motor-sensory feed-back will be stored. The specificity of the perceptual and motor patterns used, may have produced schemata with good resistance against forgetting.
“…Data on the retention of continuous movements come from studies of i pursuit tracking (19,64,71,103,115,126), compensatory tracking (9,14,18,48,87), and balancing (88,101,109,115).…”
“…that retention of motor skills over long delays is good [12]- [13]. Subjects typically show a reduction in performance of just 20 % and recover rapidly their previous skill after a few practice trials [13]- [14]. In our knowledge, the longest delays go to 1 year to 5 years in essentially perceptivo motor tasks as pursuit rotor, button-pushing tasks, or memory tasks [13]- [15]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…that retention of motor skills over long delays is good [12]- [13]. Subjects typically show a reduction in performance of just 20 % and recover rapidly their previous skill after a few practice trials [13]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects typically show a reduction in performance of just 20 % and recover rapidly their previous skill after a few practice trials [13]- [14]. In our knowledge, the longest delays go to 1 year to 5 years in essentially perceptivo motor tasks as pursuit rotor, button-pushing tasks, or memory tasks [13]- [15]- [14]. Few recent studies deal with retention in gross motor skill (tossing, walking, postural stability task) but their interest is centred on pathological point of view [16] or re-acquisition after disturb task [17].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.