2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
154
8
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
154
8
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have reported the rate of retention to be between 1.0% and 1.7% of patients undergoing the diagnostic procedure (1,2). Common factors that predispose individuals to device retention include Crohn's disease, neoplastic lesions, nonsteroidal antiinfl ammatory drug-induced enteropathy, stenosis, and adhesions (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have reported the rate of retention to be between 1.0% and 1.7% of patients undergoing the diagnostic procedure (1,2). Common factors that predispose individuals to device retention include Crohn's disease, neoplastic lesions, nonsteroidal antiinfl ammatory drug-induced enteropathy, stenosis, and adhesions (1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cause was consistent with that in the study of Chiefetz and Lewis [5] . In contrast, some authors have reported that NSAID-induced stricture was the major cause of capsule retention [6,7] . Recently, Mason et al [8] have reported that intestinal mass or radiation enteritis are the main causes of subacute small bowel obstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the report of Barkin and Friedman [10] , the incidence was 0.75% in a large study of 900 patients who had previously normal small intestines. Most recently, Li et al [7] have reported 14 cases of CE retention (1.4%) in 1000 capsule examinations. It was shown that tumors or NSAID strictures were the major etiology of retention in both of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las complicaciones descritas para el procedimiento son bajas 31 , la más importante aunque infrecuente es la retención [32][33][34][35] . Las desventajas están dadas por su alto costo, la incapacidad de realizar acciones terapéuticas y de establecer con exactitud la relación causa y efecto, al no contar con un patrón de oro en lesiones que por sus características no requieren procedimiento terapéutico invasivo o biopsia (puntos rojos, angiodisplasias no sangrantes, lesiones protruidas inespecíficas de aspecto benigno).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified