2015
DOI: 10.1080/17513057.2015.1087097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retheorizing Adaptation:Differential Adaptationand Critical Intercultural Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, it is no surprise that keeping international faculty at US universities also entails training US-born faculty about diversity and inclusivity (Bookman, 2020). This aligns with the critical approach to intercultural communication (De La Garza and Ono, 2015), which highlights the need for mutual understanding rather than adaptation and calls for sensitivity on both ends. In higher education settings, this would entail promoting intercultural understanding in all faculty, students, staff and administrators.…”
Section: International Faculty's Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…As such, it is no surprise that keeping international faculty at US universities also entails training US-born faculty about diversity and inclusivity (Bookman, 2020). This aligns with the critical approach to intercultural communication (De La Garza and Ono, 2015), which highlights the need for mutual understanding rather than adaptation and calls for sensitivity on both ends. In higher education settings, this would entail promoting intercultural understanding in all faculty, students, staff and administrators.…”
Section: International Faculty's Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this model religion is a point of support for the processes of selective acculturation [17]. Moreover, «religion plays a crucial role in the construction of identity, in the reproduction of meanings and in the formation of values» (Levitt 2003:251) [19] This function is particularly important in the alienating experience of the migrant, far from the original context in which everything was familiar, usual, ordered, predictable tackles pressing existential and identity questions. If immigration separates men from their contest of origin, religion allows their reunion, through religious services, celebrations and, anniversaries.…”
Section: Penninx and Martiniellomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For acculturation to take place, deculturation of the past first happens for the non-dominant and/or dominant groups through the partial unlearning of their respective native culture (Kim, 2008;Gudykunst & Kim, 2003). Individuals then acculturate by creating their own culture in which they live (De La Garza & Ono, 2015;Padilla, 1980;Kerckhoff, 1953) or through integration (or multiculturalism), assimilation (or melting pot), separation (or segregation) or marginalization (or exclusion), depending on whether the process takes place from the perspective of the nondominant (or dominant) group (Berry, 2009). A limitation in acculturation research is that it traditionally relies on a 'bidimensional acculturation lens' that assumes there is a dominant and non-dominant cultural group, which is increasingly not the case in 'hyper-diverse' cities, such as Montreal (Doucerain et al, 2013).…”
Section: Hybridization Of Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%