Rethinking contextual ambidexterity through parallel structures: The case of Renault’s Fab Lab

Lô, Amadou; Diochon, Pauline Fatien

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.10076abstract

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contextual ambidexterity, it is assumed that a single organizational context can allow both exploitation and exploration. However, exploitation and exploration can develop in completely different organizational contexts (Fourné, Rosenbusch, Heyden, & Jansen, 2019;Lô & Fatien, 2018).…”

Section: Modes Of Ambidexteritymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The existing literature provides detailed information on structural, contextual, and sequential ambidexterity individually (Assen, 2019;Chou, Yang, & Chiu, 2018;Heracleous et al, 2017;Lô & Fatien, 2018). However, we currently have few studies on when and how modes of ambidexterity are combined within change initiatives (Ossenbrink et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introduction Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dynamic Ambidexterity: Proposal of a Theoretical and Hypothetical Model

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: ambidexterity is a dynamic capability that seeks to balance exploitation and exploration initiatives. The joint development of exploitation and exploration can be achieved through dynamic ambidexterity. Theoretical discussions involving the relationship between the concepts of ambidexterity and dynamic capabilities (DCs) have already been developed in literature. However, the way the three ambidextrous approaches (structural, contextual, and sequential) are based on DCs still needs to be observed by researchers. Objective: this study aims to propose a conceptual and theoretical hypothetical model that explains the influence of various types of organizational ambidexterity (structural, contextual, and sequential) on the development of DCs and their relation to organizational performance. Methodology: the study was developed through an extensive systematic literature review guided by an inductive logic, interpretive epistemology, and qualitative approach. Results: the analyses and discussions made it possible to present a theoretical hypothetical model of dynamic ambidexterity that involves nine constructs and eleven hypotheses. Conclusion: we believe that our study contributes theoretically to the field of organizational Strategies and can enable studies aligned with the concepts of dynamic ambidexterity and DCs.

show abstract

Section: Modes Of Ambidexteritymentioning

confidence: 99%