Rethinking enterprise flexibility: a new approach based on management control theory

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to a void in the literature on enterprise flexibility: The Management Control Systems’ (MCS) role in the enterprise flexibility and stability discussion. MCS can be instrumental in securing an organization’s strategic performance objectives, far beyond the mere managerial control and accounting perspectives of traditional MCS’ roles. Design/methodology/approach This study is qualitative in nature, and presents a theoretical approach with a conceptual model to address enterprise flexibility and stability jointly; arguing that both should be part of the MCS’ design and implementation with a distinct strategic outlook. Several theoretical and practical arguments are presented which reinforce this thesis. Findings To operate optimally, enterprises must be able to manage their limited resources in efficient and effective manner. This is especially so when dealing with uncertainty and contingencies on an ongoing basis, while following a defined strategic choice. Such choices are expected to mirror enterprise flexibility types and measures without neglecting enterprise stability requirements, linking both to strategic performance measurement indicators. Research limitations/implications Further work is needed to explore not only how different types of enterprise flexibility and stability measures can bring additional benefits to the firm but also how best to apply such types in accordance with business and operations strategies, organizational stability requirements and management control strategies. Practical implications MCS can and should take part of an organization’s strategic performance measures but these are to be understood from a systemic design perspective of the enterprise system’s metacontrollability, addressing flexibility and stability jointly. Social implications There is a need to reevaluate the role of MCS and their strategic potential. The approach presented can have valuable potential ramifications and insights for management and information sciences as well as for the enterprise management practitioners as a whole. Originality/value This paper provides original research on enterprise flexibility and stability analysis, covering all aspects of MC and its role on the enterprise’s metacontrollability. Design and coordination of the seven basic elements which comprise MCS are analyzed, as well as how they influence one another. The paper includes two tables to illustrate the approach being proposed. Table I presents a classification of the literature reviewed in the paper while Table AI presents the choice of the theoretical lens on enterprise flexibility from other authors which contrasts with the model proposed. The role of MCS in the enterprise is also included.

Hybrid strategy and firm performance: a time-series qualitative comparative analysis of the Chinese ICT sector

“…In short, when marketing is insufficient, firms can achieve high performance by maintaining high stability and growth. Ensuring stability is crucial to enhance firm competitiveness during high growth (Yanine et al, 2016). A high level of stability reduces staff turnover.…”

The best equilibrium in organizational flexibility-stability continuums

“…It is also the case that a Best equilibrium desirable level of flexibility can only be achieved with a degree of stability (De Leeuw and Volberda, 1996). Neither one nor the other state is desirable in its most extreme form (Yanine et al, 2016), as in something approaching a one hundred per cent flexible (hyper-flexible) or stable (hyper-stable) situation. Hyper-flexibility would lead to chaos and inefficiency, because organizational members would not know what, when or how to act or with whom, due to a lack of rules and organizational structures.…”

“…So far, research has focused on organizational flexibility potential (Bernardes and Hanna, 2009; Boyle, 2006; Dreyer and Grønhaug, 2004; Englehardt and Simmons, 2002; Liu et al , 2009) and only rarely on the coordination between stability and flexibility. In cases where reference is made to the importance of the balance between flexibility and stability (Deuringer, 2000; Mayrhofer, 1997; Volberda, 1998; Yanine et al , 2016), the question of where the optimum on the flexibility-stability continuum lies has not been addressed. However, this is an essential question because there is by definition no better condition than the optimal condition (Gigerenzer, 2007).…”

The effect of supply chain learning on flexibility performance: an empirical study

“…In today's intensely dynamic market climate, firms must confront the complexity, volatility, and other risk factors owing to the reality that they are entirely accessible sociotechnical structures (Yanine et al, 2016;Dahooie et al, 2020). For supply chain processes, as for all company activities, the minimization of these risks is critical.…”