2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.110053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking interleukin-6 blockade for treatment of COVID-19

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, IL-6-blocking substances must not be seen as the final key treatments to combat COVID-19, as IL-6 is not solely responsible for the cytokine storm in COVID-19 because it still remains unclear whether elevated IL-6 in viral infections, and SARS-CoV-2 in particular, represents a therapeutic target or part of a functioning adaptive immune response. Indeed, studies have shown that intravenous administration of monoclonal IL-6 in healthy volunteers, at levels significantly exceeding the concentrations found in COVID-19, did not result in pulmonary adverse events, which further questions the importance of IL-6 in COVID-19 [ 109 , 110 ]. Moreover, patients with severe COVID-19 who have been administered anti–IL-6 treatments have reported having higher numbers of secondary infections [ 111 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, IL-6-blocking substances must not be seen as the final key treatments to combat COVID-19, as IL-6 is not solely responsible for the cytokine storm in COVID-19 because it still remains unclear whether elevated IL-6 in viral infections, and SARS-CoV-2 in particular, represents a therapeutic target or part of a functioning adaptive immune response. Indeed, studies have shown that intravenous administration of monoclonal IL-6 in healthy volunteers, at levels significantly exceeding the concentrations found in COVID-19, did not result in pulmonary adverse events, which further questions the importance of IL-6 in COVID-19 [ 109 , 110 ]. Moreover, patients with severe COVID-19 who have been administered anti–IL-6 treatments have reported having higher numbers of secondary infections [ 111 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the undoubted efficacy of IL-6 inhibitors in patients with severe COVID-19, the role of these drugs and IL-6 in the pathogenesis of CSS should be further investigated [ [111] , [112] , [113] ]. In patients with severe COVID-19, the average concentration of IL-6 in the blood serum is significantly lower (in the range from 7 to 627 mg/ml, on average 132.32 ± 278.54 pkg/ml) [ 26 , [114] , [115] , [116] , [117] ] than in patients with ARDS caused by other viral infections (578-1618 pg/ml) [ [118] , [119] , [120] ].…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies found considerable clinical improvements resulting from treatment with IL-6 blockers (236-239), others do not report any significant difference between the clinical features of groups treated with anti-IL6/ IL-6R mAbs and their respective controls (without anti-IL-6/IL-6R) (240)(241)(242)(243). These controversial results can be explained by the pleiotropic function of IL-6, which also play an important anti-inflammatory role, questioning the use of IL-6 blockade to suppress inflammation-induced tissue damage (244). Additionally, severe side effects have been associated with the use of IL-6 blockers, including enhanced hepatic enzymes, thrombocytopenia, severe bacterial and fungal infections, and sepsis (241,245).…”
Section: Antibody-based Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%