2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rethinking the admission criteria to nursing school

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
6
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
41
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Signal detection theory is applicable wherever criteria are applied in decision-making regardless of the specific context and goals, for example, in validating criteria of multiple mini interviews (Patterson et al 2016). Following up on Shulruf, Hattie, and Tumen (2008), Shulruf et al (2011) andSteenman, Bakker, andvan Tartwijk (2014), future application of signal detection theory might be informative on comparisons of selection outcomes given different operationalisations of SSGPA and academic achievement. The relatively small proportion of unsuccessful students does mean that all interpretations are preliminary and awaiting replication with a larger sample.…”
Section: Implementation Of Signal Detection Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Signal detection theory is applicable wherever criteria are applied in decision-making regardless of the specific context and goals, for example, in validating criteria of multiple mini interviews (Patterson et al 2016). Following up on Shulruf, Hattie, and Tumen (2008), Shulruf et al (2011) andSteenman, Bakker, andvan Tartwijk (2014), future application of signal detection theory might be informative on comparisons of selection outcomes given different operationalisations of SSGPA and academic achievement. The relatively small proportion of unsuccessful students does mean that all interpretations are preliminary and awaiting replication with a larger sample.…”
Section: Implementation Of Signal Detection Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that it is often considered the best available predictor of future academic achievement, this is logical (Richardson, Abraham, and Bond 2012), yet 'the best available' in university admissions does not equal a prediction of academic achievement that can be called accurate (Sternberg et al 2012;Sawyer 2013). Although Shulruf, Hattie, and Tumen (2008) (see also Shulruf et al 2011) found correlations >0.60 of SSGPA with university first-year GPA using a specific and new calculation of SSGPA, it is more commonly reported as only a reasonable predictor of university GPA, with r ≈ 0.40 (Richardson, Abraham, and Bond 2012;Edwards, Friedman, and Pearce 2013). Although their predictive power in most studies is arguably much smaller than desired, past academic achievement (de Koning et al 2012;van der Heijden, Hessen, and Wubbels 2012), cognitive admission tests (visser et al 2012) and non-cognitive measures (Huang 2012;Richardson, Abraham, and Bond 2012;Sternberg et al 2012) have all been shown to be valid predictors of academic achievement to a certain extent (Robbins et al 2004;O'Neill et al 2011;Sinha et al 2011;Poole et al 2012;Schmitt 2012;Stemler 2012;Kreiter and Axelson 2013;Preiss et al 2013;Sawyer 2013;Christersson et al 2014;Sartania et al 2014;Simpson et al 2014;Gaertner and Larsen McClarty 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesta relação, verifica-se a nota final do ensino pré-universitário (Shulruf et al, 2011), a prática de exercícios físicos (Bellar et al, 2014) e a qualidade do sono (Ferreira, Martino, 2012).…”
unclassified
“…Ainda no contexto da enfermagem e do desempenho acadêmico, em pesquisa realizada com 134 estudantes de graduação na Austrália, foi identificado que quanto melhor a nota alcançada no ensino pré-universitário, melhor é o desempenho do estudante no curso de enfermagem, sendo considerada a nota no ensino pré-universitário preditora para o melhor desempenho acadêmico (Shulruf et al, 2011).…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation