Rethinking the 'global' in global health: a dialectic approach

Abstract

BackgroundCurrent definitions of 'global health' lack specificity about the term 'global'. This debate presents and discusses existing definitions of 'global health' and a common problem inherent therein. It aims to provide a way forward towards an understanding of 'global health' while avoiding redundancy. The attention is concentrated on the dialectics of different concepts of 'global' in their application to malnutrition; HIV, tuberculosis & malaria; and maternal mortality. Further attention is payed to normative objectives attached to 'global health' definitions and to paradoxes involved in attempts to define the field.DiscussionThe manuscript identifies denotations of 'global' as 'worldwide', as 'transcending national boundaries' and as 'holistic'. A fourth concept of 'global' as 'supraterritorial' is presented and defined as 'links between the social determinants of health anywhere in the world'. The rhetorical power of the denotations impacts considerably on the object of 'global health', exemplified in the context of malnutrition; HIV, tuberculosis & malaria; and maternal mortality. The 'global' as 'worldwide', as 'transcending national boundaries' and as 'holistic' house contradictions which can be overcome by the fourth concept of 'global' as 'supraterritorial'. The 'global-local-relationship' inherent in the proposed concept coheres with influential anthropological and sociological views despite the use of different terminology. At the same time, it may be assembled with other views on 'global' or amend apparently conflicting ones. The author argues for detaching normative objectives from 'global health' definitions to avoid so called 'entanglement-problems'. Instead, it is argued that the proposed concept constitutes an un-euphemistical approach to describe the inherently politicised field of 'global health'.SummaryWhile global-as-worldwide and global-as-transcending-national-boundaries are misleading and produce redundancy with public and international health, global-as-supraterritorial provides 'new' objects for research, education and practice while avoiding redundancy. Linked with 'health' as a human right, this concept preserves the rhetorical power of the term 'global health' for more innovative forms of study, research and practice. The dialectic approach reveals that the contradictions involved in the different notions of the term 'global' are only of apparent nature and not exclusive, but have to be seen as complementary to each other if expected to be useful in the final step.

Globalization and Health: developing the journal to advance the field

“…Papers on international health policies (i.e. papers pertaining to the Global Fund and the Millennium Development Goals [8, 9]) were also categorised within this theme, as was the progression of the field of global health and its evolving definition [10, 11]. …”

Internationalizing Medical Education: The Special Track Curriculum 'Global Health' at Justus Liebig University Giessen

“…The elements and didactic principles for global health education presented in this article and many others can, however, be adapted to the local conditions at any other academic center (cf. [6], [7], [5], [8], [14], [18], [29]). Based on a suitable definition of Global Health, pre-existing and newly developed courses and teaching elements can be combined in a locally suitable way.…”

“…Supported by selected international publications (cf. [1], [4], [6], [5], [15], [24]), the working definition of “Global Health” applied in the SPC at the University of Giessen basically consists of three core elements:…”

“…[5]): In line with the strategy for internationalizing higher education issued by the HRK [16], the global-health-perspective includes attention for health inequities and health related consequences of processes related to globalization not only in the south but also in the northern hemisphere, including migration and climate change. Priority issues of the international health agenda like „social determinants of health“ [25], „non-communicable-diseases“ [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs355/en/], as well as the human right to health, are considered both in the global north and south, in African countries as well as in Europe, North America or Central Asia.…”

Training Surgical Residents for a Career in Academic Global Surgery: A Novel Training Model

“…The growing evidence base of surgical cost-effectiveness and the burden of trauma and injury are useful in illustrating these value propositions. [20][21][22][23][24] In Rwanda, we found that presenting new data on prehospital injury patterns to both local governmental officials and interested international stakeholders led to renewed dialog between local policy makers and our host research colleagues.…”