To think of these stars that you see overhead at night, these vast worlds that we can never reach. I would annex the planets if I could; I often think of that. It makes me sad to see them so clear and yet so far."-Cecil Rhodes (in Stead 1902, 190) "[W]hen people ask me, Why do you write about men … I say, because I like to write about aliens. It's very flip, it's also very true. I'm fascinated by this attempt to get into the Other."-Ursula K. Le Guin (in Delany 1977, 277) Speculative Frictions Cecil Rhodes was a fervent advocate of imperial expansion, and yet confessed himself unsatisfied by the territories of the earth. 1 Ursula K. Le Guin, opposed to Rhodes in matters of politics, nevertheless cast radicalism in extra-planetary terms. Rhodes the imperialist belongs to the true history of blood and conquest, but dreamt of the impossible. Le Guin the author explores the ideological predicaments of the 20th century by removing her protagonists from any recognisable timeline. 2 Both imagined the stars as an extension of the earth by other means, a speculative antechamber, catacomb and satellite, in ceaseless communion with worldly politics. The admixture of the political and the fantastical is no novelty. Science fiction and its cousins have always been understood as disruptive and potentially subversive, most obviously when they served as satires on great persons or forewarnings of disaster, but also as summations of 1 Ronnie Lipschutz notes a similar tendency in the 20th century Westphalian imagination writ large: "the stars offered a vista of limitless lebensraum" (2003, 79). 2 Le Guin is equally famous as the author of the Earthsea fantasy series (starting with A Wizard of Earthsea in 1968) and such works of science fiction as The Left Hand of Darkness (1969), The Lathe of Heaven (1971) and The Dispossessed (1974). the mood of an epoch. There has always been reason, as Brian Aldiss recalled of the 1960s, "to think of SF as ammunition in a global battle". 3 Today, the observation that non-realist fiction may be read politically is, if anything, a commonplace. In the fragmented quasidiscipline of International Relations (IR), pop cultural scholarship has evolved from a minority to a mainstream pursuit. 4 And of all the forms of cultural narrative taken up by IR, science or speculative fiction (SF or sf) has been the most popular. 5 An emergent sub-subfield its own right, the interface of SF and IR (henceforth SF/IR) exemplifies a spreading pluralism of topic and method. IR engages SF at multiple depths: as a teaching aid (e.g. Drezner 2011; Weber 2001; Ruane and James 2012; Clapton and Shepherd 2016); as a way to communicate IR concepts to a broader public (e.g. Carpenter 2012; Sterling-Folker and Folker 2006); and as a field for analysis in its own right (e.g. Dittmer 2013; Shepherd 2013). At each level, it is supposed that fundamental features of politics-the contest over which persons and collectives may exercise power, and over whom-are expressed with a certain force by an artistic genre that at first glance ...