2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Artemisia annua and Artemisia afra tea infusions vs. artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) in treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a large scale, double blind, randomized clinical trial

Abstract: Background and objective: Prior small-scale clinical trials showed that Artemisia annua and Artemisia afra infusions, decoctions, capsules, or tablets were low cost, easy to use, and efficient in curing malaria infections. In a larger-scale trial in Kalima district, Democratic Republic of Congo, we aimed to show A. annua and/or A. afra infusions were superior or at least equivalent to artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) against malaria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite potential suboptimal levels of artemisinin present in the Artemisia annua used for the present study, both 60 and 90% alcohol extracts of Artemisia annua exhibited better activity against stationary phase B. burgdorferi compared to the control antibiotics cefuroxime and doxycycline. One explanation for these results could be that constituents other than artemisinin are important in providing antimicrobial effects, a finding supported by prior studies (59,87). Artemisia annua is generally considered safe provided that the product administered has minimal or no thujone and other terpene derivatives that are potentially neurotoxic (88).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite potential suboptimal levels of artemisinin present in the Artemisia annua used for the present study, both 60 and 90% alcohol extracts of Artemisia annua exhibited better activity against stationary phase B. burgdorferi compared to the control antibiotics cefuroxime and doxycycline. One explanation for these results could be that constituents other than artemisinin are important in providing antimicrobial effects, a finding supported by prior studies (59,87). Artemisia annua is generally considered safe provided that the product administered has minimal or no thujone and other terpene derivatives that are potentially neurotoxic (88).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The use of whole plant extracts instead of single constituents offers potential advantages including providing multiple mechanisms of action and synergistic effects that can reduce the risk of developing microbial resistance. An emerging example of this can be seen in malaria treatment where significant resistance has been reported with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) (90,91), whereas preliminary studies show improved efficacy and reduced side-effects when treatment with the whole Artemisia plant is used (87,92).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concept in botanical medicine postulates that using a whole plant extract offers several potential advantages over the use of a single constituent, including multiple mechanisms of action, synergism and, in some cases, improved bioavailability as well as less side effects. An example of the clinical benefit in using whole plant extracts over single constituents or analogues may be emerging from the current use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for malaria where significant resistance has emerged (74, 75) whereas preliminary studies show improved efficacy and reduce side-effects compared to whole plant treatment (76, 77).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[72][73][74][75][76] Such systems have the ability to interrogate multiple chemical components and their combinations simultaneously, without purification of individual constituents. 5,79 These novel, non-targeted platforms also have the advantage of generating strong, testable mechanism of action hypotheses without requiring assumptions or prior knowledge regarding those mechanisms. 77,78 These may include effects by constituents on each others' solubility (or other aspects of bioavailability) or toxicity.…”
Section: In Vitro Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of recent efforts to elucidate the mechanisms of action of traditionally used NPs have reported finding a complex mixture of bioactive constituents that act at multiple targets. [2][3][4][5] Perhaps partly as a result of this still incompletely understood complexity, to date many NIH-supported clinical trials (CTs) a of complex NPs (NPCTs), in particular the majority of large, randomized, controlled clinical trials (RCTs), have failed to reject the "null hypothesis," that is, they detected no significant difference between the intervention and negative controls. [6][7][8] While CTs that fail to reject their null hypothesis can | 43 SORKIN et al still provide invaluable guidance, the results of such trials are often met with concerns that different design choiceswhether of product, dose, timing, participant eligibility criteria, outcomes, etc.-might have yielded a substantially different result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%