2022
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline

Abstract: In this paper, we present a review of how the various aspects of any study using an eye tracker (such as the instrument, methodology, environment, participant, etc.) affect the quality of the recorded eye-tracking data and the obtained eye-movement and gaze measures. We take this review to represent the empirical foundation for reporting guidelines of any study involving an eye tracker. We compare this empirical foundation to five existing reporting guidelines and to a database of 207 published eye-tracking st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 417 publications
3
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as we know that gaze estimation may suffer from make-up, poor lighting conditions, etc. (Holmqvist et al, 2022), we first determined the quality of the eye-tracking data and formalized exclusion criteria for the eye-tracking data analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as we know that gaze estimation may suffer from make-up, poor lighting conditions, etc. (Holmqvist et al, 2022), we first determined the quality of the eye-tracking data and formalized exclusion criteria for the eye-tracking data analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion rate was roughly 69% in the present study, while in our previous work it was only 13% (Hessels et al, 2020a). We highlighted one potential source of this lower data quality, namely the large pupil size or large pupil size changes after calibration (Holmqvist et al, 2022). We welcome studies on the relation between pupil size and data quality for wearable eye trackers, particularly regarding the effects of the pupil-size artifact (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The saccadometer requires an individual to look towards the visual targets on the right and left sides to allow calibration of the instrument. Calibration is defined as the process of mapping eye tracker measurements to physical gaze direction or gaze position (Holmqvist et al 2022). To extract saccade parameters, all eye tracker systems require calibration that entails having the participant accurately direct their eyes at an external target whose position is known.…”
Section: Limitations Of Saccadometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigation of visual scanning provides a fundamental window into the nature of visual-cognitive processing while performing naturalistic sensorimotor tasks such as walking and driving [3]. An activity of eye movement and visual scanning, which is composed of a sequence of gaze shifts, can be typically understood based on the technique of eye tracking [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%