“…Specifically, poor or inconsistent results for the DYS392 locus, due to a low reads coverage, even when the total sample readings were high, were described and this was also reported by the manufacturer in the manual of the FSSP kit. [11,28,39,46,48,49] Concordance between CE and MPS above 99% in allele calling was confirmed on the basis of their size. The rare discrepancies that have been highlighted in other works at the DYS392, DYS393, DYS481, DYS439, and DY576 markers have been caused by the presence of SNPs in the flanking region, primers binding site mutations, and by the use of different primer sequences employed by CE and MPS systems [26,34,46,[48][49][50][51][52].…”