2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measen.2022.100476
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RETRACTED: Phishing attack detection using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, we proposed a multi-layer adaptive framework that uses the computer vision capability of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to read images on live phishing sites to text, and synthesize speech from uploaded deep-fake videos, while using Random Forest, and LSTM network, along with web scrapped text at various predictions layered of the framework to significantly improve the detection rate and performance of AI-based models for phishing detection. Considering the fact that existing AI-based phishing detection techniques, frameworks, and approaches can only detect text-based [32], [33], [2], [28] or URL-based phishing [27], [32], [34], [35] sites which leads to their vulnerability and inability to detect image-based, or video-based phishing sites, the proposed framework is able to overcome limitations in existing approaches, significantly improve phishing attack detection, and successfully detect complex phishing webpages with multi-dimentional deep-fake videos, images, and texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this research, we proposed a multi-layer adaptive framework that uses the computer vision capability of Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to read images on live phishing sites to text, and synthesize speech from uploaded deep-fake videos, while using Random Forest, and LSTM network, along with web scrapped text at various predictions layered of the framework to significantly improve the detection rate and performance of AI-based models for phishing detection. Considering the fact that existing AI-based phishing detection techniques, frameworks, and approaches can only detect text-based [32], [33], [2], [28] or URL-based phishing [27], [32], [34], [35] sites which leads to their vulnerability and inability to detect image-based, or video-based phishing sites, the proposed framework is able to overcome limitations in existing approaches, significantly improve phishing attack detection, and successfully detect complex phishing webpages with multi-dimentional deep-fake videos, images, and texts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To stretch and validate our multilayered adaptive framework for its effectiveness in the detection of phishing sites containing any of (Text, videos, and images), or a combination of any, or all of the 3. It is worth remembering that all existing AI or machine learning-based phishing detection techniques and frameworks can only detect text-based [32], [33], [2], [28] or URL-based [27], [32], [34], [35] phishing sites leading to their vulnerabilities to; -phishing sites with friendly URL -phishing site on hacked legitimate domain name server (DNS) -Image-only phishing site -video-only phishing site or, combination of any of them in any order. To validate both the effectiveness and adaptability of our proposed framework in overcoming such limitations, we created 4 categories of phishing sites and uploaded them to a secure server with a compromised DNS on a friendly URL; the first was a text-only phishing site, image-only phishing site, video-only phishing site, and a phishing site combining all the features.…”
Section: Framework Adaptability and Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Pandiyan S et al [16] reported accuracy 85% with Light GBM. Using UCI dataset, Alnemari & Alshammari [17] compared accuracy of four models for preventing phishing attacks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chinnasamy et al [25] developed an ML approach for effective phishing attack detection. Based on the input features such as Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and Web Traffic, the link was classified as phishing or non-phishing.…”
Section: Praveena Et Al [23] Developed a Deep Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%