2022
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/20195783
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retraction of: Linear Representations of Hyperelliptic Mapping Class Groups

Abstract: Hyperelliptic mapping class groups are defined either as the centralizers of hyperelliptic involutions inside mapping class groups of oriented surfaces of finite type or as the inverse images of these centralizers by the natural epimorphisms between mapping class groups of surfaces with marked points. We study these groups in a systematic way. An application of this theory is a counterexample to the genus 2 case of a conjecture by Putman and Wieland on virtual linear representations of mapping class groups. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, for , the hyperelliptic mapping class group identifies with the mapping class group of the marked surface , in particular, we get a counterexample in genus to the conjecture by Putman and Wieland mentioned above. This fills a gap, pointed out to me by Aaron Landesman and Daniel Litt, in the proof of Theorem 3.13 in the, now-retracted, paper [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since, for , the hyperelliptic mapping class group identifies with the mapping class group of the marked surface , in particular, we get a counterexample in genus to the conjecture by Putman and Wieland mentioned above. This fills a gap, pointed out to me by Aaron Landesman and Daniel Litt, in the proof of Theorem 3.13 in the, now-retracted, paper [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Acknowledgements. I thank Aaron Landesman and Daniel Litt for their comments on [13], which eventually led me to write this paper, and two anonymous referees for their comments on a previous version which contributed to improve it.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%