2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retreatment of Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer After Prior Radiation: Executive Summary of the American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 271 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that patients with good ECOG PS and rRT doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) had median longer OS (17.8 months vs. 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and PFS (9.6 months vs. 6.8 months, p < 0.01) compared to those with poor ECOG PS and rRT below 50 Gy (EQD2) (p < 0.01) [22]. These findings provide important information for clinicians who are considering rRT treatment options for patients with rHNC [9,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results showed that patients with good ECOG PS and rRT doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) had median longer OS (17.8 months vs. 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and PFS (9.6 months vs. 6.8 months, p < 0.01) compared to those with poor ECOG PS and rRT below 50 Gy (EQD2) (p < 0.01) [22]. These findings provide important information for clinicians who are considering rRT treatment options for patients with rHNC [9,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In this study, the factors that were found to be associated with better OS included good PS (ECOG 0) and young age (below 52 years). Furthermore, the study results showed that improved DFS was observed in patients who had a PS of ECOG 0 and received a rRT dose > 60 Gys [14]. A higher radiotherapy dose was typically associated with improved local control of rHNC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treatment of recurrent or second primary malignancies in areas that have been previously irradiated is complex. Re‐irradiation may be a viable option for these patients, but it also increases the risk of disease progression and normal tissue toxicity, which may explain the poorer prognosis of patients with SHNCs in the RT group 28 . More research is needed to discover the genetic basis underlying these disparities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Most recently, the American Radium Society published Appropriate Use Criteria for head and neck cancer re-irradiation which notes that SBRT has an important role for carefully selected patients. 13 Applying this safety and efficacy experience of SBRT re-irradiation to recurrent RMS-a much more radiosensitive disease often found in younger, healthier patients (compared to recurrent SCC of the head and neck)-is therefore quite compelling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%