2020
DOI: 10.1080/2150704x.2020.1807647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrieving fPAR of maize canopy using artificial neural networks with airborne LiDAR and hyperspectral data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common approach to assessing the goodness-of-fit is calculating the adjusted R 2 [43], which accounts for model complexity and degrees of freedom to mitigate overfitting. This metric ranges from 0 to 1, where values nearing 1 indicate that the model adequately explains variation in the data, while values approaching 0 denote poor explanatory power.…”
Section: Comparison Of Goodness-of-fit Between Bp Model and Grnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to assessing the goodness-of-fit is calculating the adjusted R 2 [43], which accounts for model complexity and degrees of freedom to mitigate overfitting. This metric ranges from 0 to 1, where values nearing 1 indicate that the model adequately explains variation in the data, while values approaching 0 denote poor explanatory power.…”
Section: Comparison Of Goodness-of-fit Between Bp Model and Grnn Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also machine learning algorithms that can estimate the FPAR. Shi et al [101] demonstrated the feasibility of estimating the maize FPAR using an ANN and stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) method (R 2 > 0.6). Although there were some errors in the FPAR estimation at the flowering and maturity stages, the hybrid model still exhibited acceptable performance during the seedling stage.…”
Section: Estimating the Fpar In Canola Growth Periods With Hybrid Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%