2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03795-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrobulbar irradiation for thyroid-associated orbitopathy: double-blind comparison between 2.4 and 16 Gy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
27
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A study comparing the efficacy of high- and low-dose radiation (16 Gy versus 2.4 Gy and 20 Gy versus 10 Gy) reported no marked difference in effect and stated that the radiotherapy dose should not exceed 2.4 Gy for TAO. 60 It may take a few weeks for the effect of radiation to become apparent; the effect is temporary and may cause an increase in inflammation. Therefore, steroid therapy should be continued in the first few weeks of treatment.…”
Section: Medical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study comparing the efficacy of high- and low-dose radiation (16 Gy versus 2.4 Gy and 20 Gy versus 10 Gy) reported no marked difference in effect and stated that the radiotherapy dose should not exceed 2.4 Gy for TAO. 60 It may take a few weeks for the effect of radiation to become apparent; the effect is temporary and may cause an increase in inflammation. Therefore, steroid therapy should be continued in the first few weeks of treatment.…”
Section: Medical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41 Orbital irradiation is well tolerated, with only some transient redness of the eyes and hair loss at the temples. Concern about long-term side effects has not been substantiated.…”
Section: Very Severe Graves' Opthalmopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta vía resultaría activada por las fracciones habituales de 2 Gy/sesión, y sería la causa del edema radioinducido 60,70 . En diversas instituciones se han utilizado esquemas con menores dosis por sesión y una prolongación del tiempo total de tratamiento, con gran eficacia en el control clínico y menor toxicidad respecto al normofraccionamiento 66,71,72 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Solo existen 2 trabajos aleatorizados que comparan dosis total (DT). Uno de ellos compara 2,4 frente a 16 Gy a 0,3 y 2 Gy/sesión respectivamente, sin encontrar diferencias significativas entre ambos fraccionamientos 66 . El otro compara 3 ramas de 20 Gy (1 Gy/semanal), 10 Gy (1 Gy/día) y 20 Gy (2 Gy/día), los 2 últimos en 2 semanas.…”
Section: Esquema De Tratamientounclassified