2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrofitting of municipal coal fired heating plant with integrated biomass gasification gas turbine based cogeneration block

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They claim that the technology promises lower electricity costs than conventional biomass-fired steam turbine systems. It was found in previous work [4] that in the case of utility scale plant (above 60-90 MW of biomass energy input) a project of this type can be financially attractive. The relatively good economic performance of the project is the result of effective financial support and local policy promoting electricity generation from renewable resources.…”
Section: It Has Been Already Demonstrated In Projects Arbrementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They claim that the technology promises lower electricity costs than conventional biomass-fired steam turbine systems. It was found in previous work [4] that in the case of utility scale plant (above 60-90 MW of biomass energy input) a project of this type can be financially attractive. The relatively good economic performance of the project is the result of effective financial support and local policy promoting electricity generation from renewable resources.…”
Section: It Has Been Already Demonstrated In Projects Arbrementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dornburg et al [3] presented that the highest relative primary energy savings, that result from using biomass, can be obtained with atmospheric and pressurized integrated biomass gasification combined cycle cogeneration plants. An amount of the non-renewable primary energy that is replaced within a regional energy system by a co-generation plant can be higher than 1.0 GJ per GJ of the biomass energy input [3,4]. According to Walter et al [5] in the middle run both co-fired and pure integrated biomass gasification plants can be a better option than capture and storage of CO 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The NPV is always calculated as the function of time τ, and represents the total operation period of an installation or any other operation time given within the time period considered in the economic analysis (Bejan et al, 1996;Biezma and San Cristobal, 2006;Delivand et al, 2001;Kalina, 2010;Pettinau et al, 2013).…”
Section: Objective Function and Optimisation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C τ is the yearly cost of operation (EUR); CF τ is the yearly cash flow (EUR); J 0 is the total investment outlays (EUR); L is the liquidation value of the project (EUR); r d is discount rate; S τ is the yearly sale income (EUR); and T τ is the yearly income tax (EUR). Cash flow (CF) forms the basic criterion in the assessment of the economic effectiveness and expresses the ratio between the revenue and expenditure during the period of the operation of a business under economic analysis (Biezma and San Cristobal, 2006;Kalina, 2010;Osborne, 2010).…”
Section: Objective Function and Optimisation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of them are based on the thermodynamic equilibrium approach towards modelling gasification. Some examples are given by Brown et al (2009), Buragohain et al (2010), Kalina (2010), Klimantos et al (2009) and Schuster et al (2001). The equilibrium modelling of gasification reactors is also utilised by software available for computational analysis and simulation of energy plants, that is e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%