2010
DOI: 10.1177/1538574410366168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrograde Superior Mesenteric Artery Stenting for Acute Mesenteric Arterial Thrombosis

Abstract: Retrograde superior mesenteric artery stenting (ROMS) represents a significant development in the treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. Compared to traditional surgical mesenteric bypass, ROMS is a less invasive technique that avoids many complications associated with emergent mesenteric bypass. This case report illustrates that retrograde superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting is an option for the treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia for patients in extremis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid approach was technically successful in 3 of 6 patients for whom the percutaneous approach failed, and overall mortality was lower in the hybrid group (although not statistically significant). The authors and other proponents [31–33] draw attention to the benefits of combining laparotomy (direct bowel examination to confirm viability) with endovascular intervention, particularly for patients who would otherwise require open surgical revascularisation [14] . However, using the hybrid approach it is also possible that patients for whom an early diagnosis has been made (and therefore suitable for percutaneous endovascular intervention) would be subjected to unnecessary laparotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid approach was technically successful in 3 of 6 patients for whom the percutaneous approach failed, and overall mortality was lower in the hybrid group (although not statistically significant). The authors and other proponents [31–33] draw attention to the benefits of combining laparotomy (direct bowel examination to confirm viability) with endovascular intervention, particularly for patients who would otherwise require open surgical revascularisation [14] . However, using the hybrid approach it is also possible that patients for whom an early diagnosis has been made (and therefore suitable for percutaneous endovascular intervention) would be subjected to unnecessary laparotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful endovascular treatment was associated with improved mortality compared with traditional therapy (36% vs. 50%). 4 The technique called 'retrograde superior mesenteric artery stenting' (ROMS) combines both open surgical and endovascular methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some patients, primary stenting to restore the blood supply of ischemic bowel segments followed by laparotomy has been reported to be beneficial [25]. In another case report, retrograde stenting of the mesenteric artery during laparotomy was successful [31]. Larger studies are necessary to further evaluate the role of interventional methods in the treatment of mesenteric arterial thrombosis.…”
Section: Mesenteric Arterial Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 96%