2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Abstract: ObjectivesTo retrospectively validate the new Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS).MethodsThis study retrospectively collected the information of 619 patients (371 cases with non-hematologic malignancies, 248 cases with hematologic malignancies) who suspected of DIC in Wuhan Union Hospital during 2013-4 to 2014-6. We validated CDSS by comparing it with three leading scoring systems, from International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and Japanese Ministr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under severe coagulopathy circumstances, such as DIC, patients may easily die without early diagnosis and proper treatment. From experience of dealing with CRS-related coagulopathy, we recommend CDSS [33] as an applicable tool for better diagnosis and management of DIC. As long as any coagulopathy manifestation arises, DIC grading should be carried out every day so as to confirm the start and end time point of DIC and to dynamically monitor the severity of DIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under severe coagulopathy circumstances, such as DIC, patients may easily die without early diagnosis and proper treatment. From experience of dealing with CRS-related coagulopathy, we recommend CDSS [33] as an applicable tool for better diagnosis and management of DIC. As long as any coagulopathy manifestation arises, DIC grading should be carried out every day so as to confirm the start and end time point of DIC and to dynamically monitor the severity of DIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the CRS was graded and managed in accordance with the modified CRS grading system [32] and was judged to be severe if it was grade 3 or higher. Additionally, DIC was diagnosed by using the new Chinese DIC Scoring System (CDSS) [33], which was widely used in China and showed good performance on diagnostic and prognostic value in Chinese population [34,35].…”
Section: Clinical Trial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The JMHW criteria were the first DIC criteria and were established in Japan; however, the global standard for the diagnosis of DIC should probably be the ISTH overt‐DIC criteria . As DIC is a common and serious condition, various diagnostic criteria have been released other than the two above‐mentioned criteria, causing further confusion Thus, the establishment of an accepted standard is needed. One must remember that the establishment of different standards hinders progress in clinical practice and research on DIC by causing division, rather than a unified approach and it is just like yielding the condition after the collapse of the Tower of Babel.…”
Section: International and Japanese Diagnostic Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, much controversy exists regarding the use of the various scoring systems in clinical applications or in DIC research. In 2015, Chinese authorities published the Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS) [8]. This system includes 2 parts, one is for nonhematologic malignancies and the other is for hematological malignancies (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%