2020
DOI: 10.3201/eid2610.202296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Retrospective Screening for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in California, USA, Late 2019

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Excluding the outlier from Ellsworth AFB, we identified initial positive cases approximately two weeks prior to the first case reported (average = 11.6 days, range 2 to 27 days prior). Our results are similar to other retrospective testing that focused on PCR-based detection of residual samples [4-6]. Evaluation of residual specimens using antibody tests is still an on-going effort and may lead to different data as better assays comes available [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Excluding the outlier from Ellsworth AFB, we identified initial positive cases approximately two weeks prior to the first case reported (average = 11.6 days, range 2 to 27 days prior). Our results are similar to other retrospective testing that focused on PCR-based detection of residual samples [4-6]. Evaluation of residual specimens using antibody tests is still an on-going effort and may lead to different data as better assays comes available [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Some community-based sentinels or hospital-based patient surveys conducted outside Europe, e.g. Wuhan/China [ 13 ] and the US [ 14 16 ], retrospectively analysed respiratory samples mainly from ARI or ILI patients. The Wuhan [ 13 ] and Seattle/WA study sites [ 14 ] failed to identify SARS-CoV-2-RNA in 520 and approximately 400 samples, respectively, obtained prior to the first national confirmed COVID-19 case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, 11,400 samples from six US states prospectively collected within the month after the first verified US COVID-19 case did not render a SARS-CoV-2-positive result [ 15 ]. Similarly, a retrospective screening study on 1,700 nasopharyngeal samples from ILI patients in California covering the last two months of 2019 failed to reveal any SARS-CoV-2 positive patient [ 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is possible that pooled testing for 2018-19 samples led to lower RT-PCR sensitivity. However, pool sizes of up to 10 samples have been proven to maintain high performance when compared with individual sample testing (23,32). Despite these limitations, here we show how influenza surveillance networks are a powerful resource to analyse the presence of the new respiratory viruses sharing the ILI / SARI symptomatology, because routine collection and storage of samples months (and eventually years) before the occurrence of a new virus introduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%