1984
DOI: 10.2307/3317926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Return Migration and Tertiary Development: A Calabrian Case-Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bangladesh, the proportion of return migrants self-employed increased from 41 percent before migration to 58 percent after migration, and for Korea from 11 to 25 percent. King et al (1984) The proportion self-employed in Sri Lanka increased from 10 percent before migration to 16 percent upon returning from abroad ( Table 8). The main reason for this low percentage is that more than half of Sri Lankan migrants were female workers who were housewives before migration, and most of them became housewives again on return [Athukorala (1990), p. 335].…”
Section: Return Migration and Occupational Change: The Experience Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bangladesh, the proportion of return migrants self-employed increased from 41 percent before migration to 58 percent after migration, and for Korea from 11 to 25 percent. King et al (1984) The proportion self-employed in Sri Lanka increased from 10 percent before migration to 16 percent upon returning from abroad ( Table 8). The main reason for this low percentage is that more than half of Sri Lankan migrants were female workers who were housewives before migration, and most of them became housewives again on return [Athukorala (1990), p. 335].…”
Section: Return Migration and Occupational Change: The Experience Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We endorse the definition of King (1986aKing ( , 2000, above, with the proviso that the 'significant period abroad' can be varied according to context. In their field survey of return migration to Southern Italy carried out in the early 1980s, King et al (1984King et al ( , 1985King et al ( , 1986) specified a dual temporal threshold: at least one year spent abroad and at least a year spent back in the home community, in order to exclude temporary return visitors. Kuschminder's more recent research on return migration and reintegration in Ethiopia considered a minimum of three months for the stay abroad -on the argument that this allowed for short-term contract migration and student migration -and in the belief that this length of time still allows for 'exposure to another culture and context to have an impact on individuals' values and behaviours ' (2017, p.5).…”
Section: Defining Return Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthropology of migration during the 1970s and 80s was characterized by the studies of ethnicity, especially in the European and North American urban contexts (Vertovec, 2007) and also interest in migrants and migration study highly increased and thus anthropologists engaged in a wide range of topics including assimilation (Peterson, 1972), ethnicity and racial discrimination (Watson, 1977), forced migration (Kiste, 1974), labor migration (Wiest, 1974;Marx, 1986), return migration (Gmelch, 1980;King et al, 1984), and refugee (Gmelch, 1983). Moreover, influenced by Wallerstein's World System Theory and Marx perspectives, anthropologists studied the impact of political economy on the lives of peripheral peoples and their response to the system.…”
Section: The Study Of Migration In Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%